OnePimpTiger
01-30-2011, 09:53 PM
The very expensive tax cuts for the rich (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/8/13/892503/-The-very-expensive-tax-cuts-for-the-rich)
http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/6685/GR2010081106717_thumb_454x592_23659.gif
I know some of you will agree with their position on this...fair enough. Some feel people should provide for themselves and have a right to keep what they have earned while others feel some people deserve to be provided for by taking from what others have earned. That will always be debated.
What (I'm hoping) will not be debated is the completely incorrect logic expressed by the Daily Kos just below this graphic:
By the way, that plan on the right, the Republican one that Kent Conrad and Ben Nelson like so much? It adds $36 billion to the deficit.
How does not collecting income "add to the deficit"? In your personal finances, when you don't get a raise at work, do you call that increasing your debt? There is only one thing that "adds" to the deficit, spending. Will that ever sink in?
http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/6685/GR2010081106717_thumb_454x592_23659.gif
I know some of you will agree with their position on this...fair enough. Some feel people should provide for themselves and have a right to keep what they have earned while others feel some people deserve to be provided for by taking from what others have earned. That will always be debated.
What (I'm hoping) will not be debated is the completely incorrect logic expressed by the Daily Kos just below this graphic:
By the way, that plan on the right, the Republican one that Kent Conrad and Ben Nelson like so much? It adds $36 billion to the deficit.
How does not collecting income "add to the deficit"? In your personal finances, when you don't get a raise at work, do you call that increasing your debt? There is only one thing that "adds" to the deficit, spending. Will that ever sink in?