PDA

View Full Version : Chelsea Clinton speaks about Rush Limbaugh attacks



mrveggieman
04-03-2012, 08:53 AM
What a real tough guy rush is to attack a 13 year old girl.

http://news.yahoo.com/chelsea-clinton-sandra-fluke-unite-over-rush-limbaugh-212952854--abc-news-politics.html

duane1969
04-03-2012, 09:45 AM
What is this, 20 years old? If they want to go after Rush over something he said 20 years ago, more power to them.

mrveggieman
04-03-2012, 09:55 AM
What is this, 20 years old? If they want to go after Rush over something he said 20 years ago, more power to them.


Chelsea was 20 years ago but Sandra Fluke was recent. It shows that rush is a coward who has a history of attacking women.

shrewsbury
04-03-2012, 09:55 AM
someone cleaning out the closet?

duane1969
04-03-2012, 10:04 AM
Chelsea was 20 years ago but Sandra Fluke was recent. It shows that rush is a coward who has a history of attacking women.

So Rush said something negative about Clinton 20 years ago and something negative about Fluke recently and now we have proof that Rush has a history of attacking women. LOL whatever. :rolleyes:

mrveggieman
04-03-2012, 10:26 AM
So Rush said something negative about Clinton 20 years ago and something negative about Fluke recently and now we have proof that Rush has a history of attacking women. LOL whatever. :rolleyes:


Here's the latest woman that rush attacked. I wonder if he does his own mama like that?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2012/03/06/heres-the-woman-rush-limbaugh-is-attacking-today-totally-bizarre-she-says/

Wickabee
04-03-2012, 10:58 AM
What do you want from a junkie?

duane1969
04-03-2012, 12:34 PM
Of all of the things to be concerned about, what Rush said about Chelsea Clinton 20 years ago or about Sandra Fluke a few weeks ago is about as low on the importance meter as it gets.

Monsterx
04-03-2012, 12:49 PM
Of all of the things to be concerned about, what Rush said about Chelsea Clinton 20 years ago or about Sandra Fluke a few weeks ago is about as low on the importance meter as it gets.
Ditto

boba
04-03-2012, 01:09 PM
Do you realize Rush attacks a lot more men then women.



This is just another attempt by liberals to paint an image that the GOP is fighting a war against women.

Star_Cards
04-03-2012, 01:45 PM
Do you realize Rush attacks a lot more men then women.



This is just another attempt by liberals to paint an image that the GOP is fighting a war against women.

I don't see it as liberals painting an image of the GOP fighting a war against women. I see it as chelsea saying that she sympathizes with rush speaking about her in a negative manner. although with chelsea, rush really had no reason to discuss her looks at all. I hardly see it as some liberal conspiracy.

INTIMADATOR2007
04-03-2012, 06:19 PM
I the mean time Rush Limbuagh's ratings are through the roof , and Liberal radio still is looking for listeners.

duane1969
04-03-2012, 06:22 PM
Do you realize Rush attacks a lot more men then women.



This is just another attempt by liberals to paint an image that the GOP is fighting a war against women.

That is not relevant. He said something bad about two women in a 20 year span so there is clear evidence here that he targets women in his attacks.

Star_Cards
04-04-2012, 08:45 AM
That is not relevant. He said something bad about two women in a 20 year span so there is clear evidence here that he targets women in his attacks.

Who's claiming that he's a women attacker? I read the article more as chelsea sympathizing not some "liberal" conspiracy to paint rush in a certain light. Rush paints himself in the light that people see him. He doesn't need anyone else to help paint him in a negative light from time to time.

ensbergcollector
04-04-2012, 10:06 AM
Who's claiming that he's a women attacker? I read the article more as chelsea sympathizing not some "liberal" conspiracy to paint rush in a certain light. Rush paints himself in the light that people see him. He doesn't need anyone else to help paint him in a negative light from time to time.

just read the third post in this thread

duane1969
04-04-2012, 11:35 AM
Who's claiming that he's a women attacker? I read the article more as chelsea sympathizing not some "liberal" conspiracy to paint rush in a certain light. Rush paints himself in the light that people see him. He doesn't need anyone else to help paint him in a negative light from time to time.

veggie is...


Chelsea was 20 years ago but Sandra Fluke was recent. It shows that rush is a coward who has a history of attacking women.

mrveggieman
04-04-2012, 12:02 PM
veggie is...


I said it and I stand by what I said. :smokin:

duane1969
04-04-2012, 12:04 PM
I said it and I stand by what I said. :smokin:

I would expect nothing less...

Star_Cards
04-04-2012, 12:06 PM
veggie is...

ah... I thought you were talking about an eluded liberal agenda as posted previously by someone else.

duane1969
04-04-2012, 12:13 PM
ah... I thought you were talking about an eluded liberal agenda as posted previously by someone else.

Nope. Just responding to another of veggie's typically broad and unfounded statements :)

mrveggieman
04-04-2012, 12:40 PM
Nope. Just responding to another of veggie's typically broad and unfounded statements :)


Wow, thanks duane. I feel right at home with everyone else's broad and undounded statements on P&R. :kiss: