View Full Version : Baseball's Average Salary Tops $2.5 Million; a-Rod Outearns Devil Rays


gioperation
04-03-2003, 10:53 PM
Baseball's Average Salary Tops $2.5 Million; a-Rod Outearns Devil Rays
Apr 3, 4:54 PM (ET) Email this Story

By RONALD BLUM
NEW YORK (AP) - At $22 million this year, Texas Rangers shortstop Alex Rodriguez makes more money than any other baseball player. He makes more money than the entire Tampa Bay Devil Rays team, too.

Pity the poor Devil Rays. Their skimpy payroll is even smaller than the gap between the top-spending New York Yankees and runner-up New York Mets.

A study of 2003 baseball salaries by The Associated Press turned up those and other eye-popping revelations, including:

- Baseball's average salary shot past $2.5 million for the first time on opening day this week.

- The Yankees spend nearly $150 million.


- The Mets are No. 2 at $116.9 million.

- Los Angeles, Atlanta and Texas also topped $100 million.

- The Devil Rays, in comparison, are practically living on skid row with a 25-man roster costing $19.6 million.

Rodriguez, the youngest player to hit 300 homers, leads all players in salary for the third straight year.

When it comes to teams, the Yankees are in a world of their own.

They've had the fattest payroll in the major leagues the last four seasons - and it got even fatter after their first-round loss to Anaheim in the American League playoffs. That's when they went shopping for more talent, landing Japanese slugger Hideki Matsui and Cuban pitcher Jose Contreras.

"Regardless of who we signed or how much money we make, we have to go out and play," said the highest-paid Yankee of them all at $15.6 million, shortstop Derek Jeter, out at least a month with an injured shoulder. "Our goal is to win regardless of what our payroll is."

Yes, but the Yankees' deep pockets just might serve as an impetus for other teams to get 'em where it counts - on the field.

"It's actually nice to have a competitor like the Yankees because it will be all the more satisfying when we beat them," Red Sox chairman Tom Werner said.

The Mets hope the addition of pitcher Tom Glavine, shelled in his first start Monday, proves to be a stroke of genius come October.

"You always want to spend or invest prudently, and we think we have," owner Fred Wilpon said. "But there are no guarantees in life. I really believe that we have a postseason team. That's what this team was built for, and now we'll see."

Overall, the average salary rose 7.2 percent to $2,555,476, behind the NBA ($4.54 million) but ahead of the NHL ($1.64 million) and the NFL ($1.25 million).

In a sign of baseball's economic slowdown, the number of players making $1 million or more dropped to 385 from 413 last year and 425 in 2000. The median salary - the point at which an equal amount of players is above and below - dropped to $800,000 from $900,000 at the start of last season and $975,000 in 2000.

Baseball owners have cited the weak economy and the luxury tax as reasons some teams lowered payroll. The drop in the median and the decrease in millionaires could be a sign that much of this year's rise is due to old multiyear contracts with built-in raises.

Figures for the study included salaries and prorated shares of signing bonuses and other guaranteed income; for some players, parts of salaries deferred without interest were discounted to present-day value.

The AP's study also showed:

- Behind Rodriguez on the highest-paid list were Toronto's Carlos Delgado ($18.7 million), Boston's Manny Ramirez ($17.2 million), the Mets' Mo Vaughn ($17.2 million) and the Chicago Cubs' Sammy Sosa ($16.9 million).

- Anaheim followed its first World Series title by boosting its payroll to $79 million, keeping all its key players. The Angels began 2002 at $61.7 million.

- Philadelphia, which moves into a new ballpark in 2004, made a big payroll jump (from $58 million to $70.8 million), as did division champions Minnesota and Oakland.

- Cleveland dropped from $78.9 million at the start of last season to $48.8 million; Toronto, Arizona, Boston and Milwaukee also had big decreases.

jdfan123
04-03-2003, 10:58 PM
and tampa will win as many as texas this year watch

gioperation
04-03-2003, 11:01 PM
I think they learned something from the twins, A's, and the angels, you might not have to spend alot of money to win, just find hungry young players and let them know, the yank's have to spend the $$$ because they have a legacy that says they have to contend every year and nothing short of finishing at the top is acceptable.

JMO

thekingpin
04-04-2003, 12:04 AM
I hate to admit it, but although the Yanks spend a ton of money every year to be contenders... they do have a great ballclub, huge fan support, and a legacy that every other team in every other major sport would love to have.

Despite that, baseball players need to learn that salaries like that of A-Rod's are rediculous. Owners would love a salary cap, but the players would never stand for it. Capitalism at its best guys...

I for one, if I were an owner of a team... (I wish)... wouldn't dare spend the money that A-Rod is getting. I'd sooner give a little extra to a younger talent, and work to develop his skills. The Yanks have been very good at this. And it's one of the biggest reasons why they are so successful. Case & point... Derek Jeter & Alfonzo Soriano. There's a history of tremendous home grown talent with the Yanks. They develop these guys, and then make sure they are well taken care of once they're ready for the majors.

As teams realize that they can focus their efforts in the minors.. it will only begin to improve the teams in the majors.

podstock
04-04-2003, 04:03 AM
in baseball/football ---- one player, no matter how good (Joe Montana, John Elway, Cal Ripken, Barry Bonds) he is, cannot lead his team to victory solely by himself.

with the above article, you can see why baseball is such a farce. When you have this type of inequity, where one player makes as much as an entire team, that sport is headed into the tank

plunge
04-04-2003, 08:26 AM
The only other industry that is as skewed as baseball is the movie industry.

I agree that Tampa could win as many games as Texas. And the Yankees have become the Goliath to all the Davids in baseball. I don't think it was ever sweeter for teams like Oakland and Anaheim to have a better season than the Yankees.

True the Yankees have a very good following. They also have a strong anti-following in Boston and in NY. In New York, geography, like in Chicago, sets the standard. Yankees have the Bronx, Westchester, Manhattan and the northern half of Jersey. The Mets have Brooklyn, Queens and all of Long Island.

gioperation
04-04-2003, 09:53 AM
and both of those team can sink into the ocean, GO CUBS

plunge
04-04-2003, 10:10 AM
Now, now, gi. Let's be nice.

pwaldo
04-04-2003, 11:23 AM
Originally posted by podstock
in baseball/football ---- one player, no matter how good (Joe Montana, John Elway, Cal Ripken, Barry Bonds) he is, cannot lead his team to victory solely by himself.

with the above article, you can see why baseball is such a farce. When you have this type of inequity, where one player makes as much as an entire team, that sport is headed into the tank

You can put the blame on Bud for baseball's decline. This guy has never made a good move for baseball ever since becoming commisioner. He has to go if baseball ever wants to regain some popularity.

podstock
04-04-2003, 01:26 PM
When I hear the name Bud Selig, I think of the tie in last year's All-Star game.

As a matter of fact, I am thrilled someone OTHER than Joe Torre is managing it.

I hope Mike Scioscia brings ALL the Angels to the All-star game with him, and no Yankees, other than any Yanks voted into the starting line-up.

pwaldo
04-04-2003, 01:52 PM
Originally posted by podstock
When I hear the name Bud Selig, I think of the tie in last year's All-Star game.

As a matter of fact, I am thrilled someone OTHER than Joe Torre is managing it.

I hope Mike Scioscia brings ALL the Angels to the All-star game with him, and no Yankees, other than any Yanks voted into the starting line-up.

Yes because we all know that the Angels have better All-Stars than the Yankees. :rolleyes:

podstock
04-04-2003, 02:16 PM
I just like the fact that the Angels are a team with half the salary of the yankees.

$79M vs $150+M

gioperation
04-04-2003, 04:21 PM
I wouldn't exactly say that the angels are better, I think they were streaking at the right time though if we went position for position I would have to say the yanks would win that war. and just wait until they get those advanced scouts on the kid rod, he sucks,

pwaldo
04-04-2003, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by podstock
I just like the fact that the Angels are a team with half the salary of the yankees.

$79M vs $150+M

Well that's great about the salary but that has nothing to do with who Torre brought to the All-Star game compared with who Mike Scioscia could bring.

Yes, Torre brought some questionable players but they were people like Jeter and Rivera. But at least they played the actually game and cared rather than some of these players that made 1 pitch and then hit the showers.

podstock
04-04-2003, 06:17 PM
That was Torre's fault. His philosophy is to let everyone play.

You can bet that's never going to be allowed again.

I doubt, as long as Bud Selig is alive, that we will have another All Star game end in a tie.

pwaldo
04-05-2003, 11:10 AM
I wasn't talking about the All-Star game ending in a tie. Yes it was Torre and the Diamondbacks manager and Bud's fault. The fans paid for a game and a game should not end in a tie.

What I was saying is that at least the players that Torre picked from the Yankees went to the game. Unlike these players that got chosen and didn't show up because they wanted the "time off". Or the people who left the game before it was over.

Then they wonder why nobody shows up for a game to watch them play.

gioperation
04-05-2003, 11:28 AM
Well they should make the players stay for the whole gam, not some token visit, because think of all the kids that would line up after the game to get auto's signed. I also think that with all the money being spent on players I believe they should be made to sign all auto's I believe that is the their job, when in uniform if they don't want to sign auto, while in a public place then that is cool but anytime they are on the property of a ball club they should have to sign no matter if it took 2 hours or 3 hours.

JMO

pwaldo
04-05-2003, 08:23 PM
Originally posted by gioperation
Well they should make the players stay for the whole gam, not some token visit, because think of all the kids that would line up after the game to get auto's signed. I also think that with all the money being spent on players I believe they should be made to sign all auto's I believe that is the their job, when in uniform if they don't want to sign auto, while in a public place then that is cool but anytime they are on the property of a ball club they should have to sign no matter if it took 2 hours or 3 hours.

JMO

Exactly, you would think that these players would not mind signing a few autographs for people who are paying their salary. But they do. They make it sound like it is so tough when it is not.