Which team do you think got the better end of the Peerless Price trade?
- Atlanta
-Buffalo
-The trade was even

Buffalo. You only need one great receiver and I'm not convinced Peerless can do it by himself when Moulds has proven he can. That also freed up money for the Bills to go get Takeo which they needed desperately.

Atlanta- Price will help there passing game alot.

I'd says its even I can see both teams winning another 2 games each!!

atlanta because price will improve their passing game soooo much just like irish said..us irish boys must think alike

Both teams made out pretty good. One team needed a WR and got it and the other freed up some money to be used on defense. Hopefully this trade works out in Buffalo's favor though.

yea i think both teams made out very well ,,but what do i know i am a pats fan........lol go pats

hahah I am a Jets fan...this just loaded up the AFC more than it already is

Peerless is a great WR, but a team cant run just on one main guy. You need a great backup so the DBs dont know where the ball is going to be thrown. I think Buffalo got the better part of the trade.

Dave

I'd say the Falcons got a better trade. Odds are the draft pick proves to be lousy as many have in the past.

Tim

That is a good point, but if you look back to many Superbowl victors, they don't have ONE great WR but they have multiples. I think the main thing for teams is defense. With Spikes they will have a better chance, even though i think it will take a couple more seasons to grow in strength.

Dave

Atlanta probably got the better end of the deal. Add him to the several competent receivers they have already, throw in a healthy running tandem of Duckett / Dunn, and they're scary.

That's true, but who will be secendary for them? Like i said you cant just have one WR. Need to have a couple so the ball gets spread out more.