View Full Version : 1957 Milwaukee Braves signed ball - authentic?
EtherealSOC
04-15-2009, 08:38 PM
Hello all,
Can you help me judge if this ball - for sale locally - is authentic? I know it is hard to judge vintage autographs using pictures, but any insight helps. My thoughts are they appear to be in varying width and ink color which is a bonus and might indicate they are not stamped.
The ball is on sale for $300 which seems like a bargain for a 50's championship team with Hank Aaron, Eddie Mathews and Warren Spahn.
What do you all think?
PS: PSA/DNA charges $10 even to evaluate photos and give a quick opinion. Personally I think it's a shame that they can't offer this service for free due to the massive problem that counterfeiting represents to the hobby. That's my two cents, anyway. -E
24781
24782
24783
24784
iowa49erfan
04-15-2009, 10:19 PM
Really hard to tell with the flash on the case.
I'd try the PSA quick look to see what they come back with.
What is the seller listing as a COA for it?
EtherealSOC
04-16-2009, 09:51 AM
They don't have a COA. Claims to have owned it for over 25 years and it was given as a gift...
iowa49erfan
04-16-2009, 10:21 AM
Yeah, it's hard when it comes to that. You know you want to trust someone but at the same time it's hard to do.
I'd definitely take advantage of the PSA/DNA if you're serious about purchasing.
Chuck-17
04-16-2009, 11:07 AM
Yeah, it's hard when it comes to that. You know you want to trust someone but at the same time it's hard to do.
I'd definitely take advantage of the PSA/DNA if you're serious about purchasing.
I agree 100%. If you are willing to buy that ball it is probably worth spending a few dollars to get an expert opinion.
TheRoseBull
04-25-2009, 07:43 PM
I agree. 10$ to get a quick opinion.. best way to go.
xpress34
04-26-2009, 12:19 AM
Etheral -
I hate to be the 'Nay Sayer' here, but based on the photos, I'm about 95% positive that you are looking at a pre-print Stadium Souvenir Ball.
It is very much Vintage as teams don't usually re-do previous teams and such and I don't know of anyone who has ever tried to forge pre-prints - although some can command a pretty penny. Especially when they are nice and clean like this one.
TWO tale tell signs from what I can see:
1) NO Brand Label - Spalding or Reach should be a Spalding for National League in 1957. Also, NO 'Official National League Ball' Stamp or League President (should be William Harridge for that era).
2) Notice how a few of the signatures go into the stitching but the ink isn't on the threads? That's because the panels are PRE Stamped before they are stitched together. In Picture #3 for example, the 'J' in Joe goes directly through a stich hole, but there is no 'bump' or interruption in the line as you would expect when the pen hit the thread.
Again, sorry to be the 'downer' here, but I don't like seeing people spending their hard earned money on bad items.
- Chris
P.S. - If you go back and look for the things I just mentioned, then I also saved you the $10 you would spend on a Quick Opinion!!!
nebboy
04-29-2009, 01:36 PM
Love to have seen balls maker mark to see it is a from correct time frame, also all sigs seem to be from same pin. Thanks for the look keep us posted
Fisk-Factor75
05-04-2009, 07:02 PM
I agree with Xpress....I was thinking the same thing before I read his post.
al032184
05-05-2009, 12:08 PM
Another way you can tell a pre-print, everyone has written their name to be completely legible