radioheadfloyd
08-16-2004, 02:36 AM
What do you guys thinks is better to collect as an investment?
A good RB rookie card or a good QB rookie card? Or even WR... but I do not think that would get many votes..
minew_m
08-16-2004, 11:35 AM
I'd go with QB. They usually seem to get the most attention in the card market and usually show the most movement in beckett.
pr0phet
08-16-2004, 11:40 AM
I got RB, Qb's are great if you really want to try to hit it big((favre-elway-marino)) But you can also get a ryan leaf.
With an RB, most of them hold there own IMO and even though they never reach superstar prices they are pretty high
Jay
CrawfordFan13
08-16-2004, 05:48 PM
Id go with QB when their good their cards a high $$
dfr52
05-16-2009, 01:47 AM
RB's usually start right away and make an impact on the hobby.
thenext54
05-16-2009, 02:26 AM
RBs are good for quick returns, unless they are really special like LT or AP.
QBs take a pretty good eye to decide who to start collecting and might take some patience if you are looking for a return profit.
Ryo1549
05-16-2009, 02:26 AM
Long term is QB by far.
Short term is RBs because they don't last as long.
JFBanicki
05-16-2009, 03:14 AM
well if looking for most bang for the buck look for under-rated qb's, rb's will give you good value if you pull one of the most hyped ones while their hot but only if you pull one from a low priced box or a pack, but with the under-rated qb's you can get their rookies for pretty cheap and if they have just one decent season you can see a nice jump in prices and would be able to sell for a good profit, look at cassel if you dont believe me. The rb's are more hit or miss, mostly off of hype and build-up, look at kevin smith' rookies, good stats on a crappy team and he gets no respect while other rookie rb's who did FAR less have FAR higher bv.