titan102390
03-12-2003, 11:17 PM
both teams have picked up at least 4 guys but who will have the better teams in the 03-04 season?
|
View Full Version : better offseason cards vs. skins titan102390 03-12-2003, 11:17 PM both teams have picked up at least 4 guys but who will have the better teams in the 03-04 season? swedishfish 03-13-2003, 11:53 AM The skins will have better year because they had more good players before they added more in free agency than the cards wdwain 04-19-2003, 05:50 PM The Redskins made by far the best offseason moves. podstock 04-19-2003, 05:58 PM Cardinals haven't done much to add to their talent; Emmitt was brought in to bring in fan attendance. Redskins should be much better under Spurry's 2nd year. radioheadfloyd 04-19-2003, 06:14 PM The Cardinals lost Plummer and Boston. They aren't going anywhere. podstock 04-19-2003, 08:43 PM Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB pwaldo 04-22-2003, 08:10 PM Originally posted by podstock Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB I don't think that it was Plummer's fault. Its the team that sucked around him. Now he gets his final chance to prove himself in Denver. |