Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing
to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and
make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
  
-
I respect your opinion but IF it was child porn and she waited and stabbed him in his sleep GOOD JOB.And that is just the way I see it.
Having vigilantes roaming around deciding to take the law into their own hands is a very scary stance to have no matter how awful child pornography is.
I personally don't think the death penalty is the proper sentence for people who watch child porn no matter how bad it is.
-
-
Nobody called her a hero,she will pay for her crime.I just think IF (BIG WORD HERE) he was looking at child porn I am glad she was so appauled she stabbed him.Again just my opinion your entitled to yours.But if you dealt with child molesters on a daily basis like i do for years and years I think you might have a different view.Now granted White was looking at just pictures supposedly but if it was child porn he should have been doing something else
THANK YOU!
Sure we all know Child Porn is wrong and shouldn't be supported but killing a harmless man in his sleep is applauded? Yes I will call him harmless as he never laid a hand or acted upon anybody nor had any intent to, he was simply watching a video. Does watching a video make murder now both acceptable and applaud-able? If the man was asleep why not call the cops and they can come pick him up, he's not going to run from the cops in his sleep so why resort to killing him? Killing child molesters and those involved in child porn is too easy, let them rot in a cell for the next 50 years and let the inmates beat the crap out of them don't just kill them instantly and let them off the hook.
On one hand you have a guy who "may have" been watching child porn (we don't even know if he broke a law or not) while in the other hand we have a psycho lady who stabbed and killed a man in his sleep (a definite crime). Why is the "may have" guy getting treated like a scum when theres no proof but the actual murderer is being called a hero?
For those that think the lady did right in killing Matthew White you are sorely mistaken. She took the time to even plan out the stabbing by bringing the knives into the bedroom and waiting until he fell asleep. You mean to tell me that in that amount of time she couldn't have contacted the police once and let them do their job? Thats the problem today people think they know best and can take the law into their own hands, it doesn't matter what somebody did you have zero right to kill them, the only time murder is ever acceptable is in self defense and your life was truly in danger. Not a single soul was harmed by Matthew White so why was killed as if there was somebody he was harming?
-
I would harldy call a wife or girlfriend catching her spouse vigilantes roaming.Again if you caught someone close to you doing this horrible act or worse would you want to talk it out and give a pat on the back???
Having vigilantes roaming around deciding to take the law into their own hands is a very scary stance to have no matter how awful child pornography is.
I personally don't think the death penalty is the proper sentence for people who watch child porn no matter how bad it is.
-
-
THANK YOU!
Sure we all know Child Porn is wrong and shouldn't be supported but killing a harmless man in his sleep is applauded? Yes I will call him harmless as he never laid a hand or acted upon anybody nor had any intent to, he was simply watching a video. Does watching a video make murder now both acceptable and applaud-able? If the man was asleep why not call the cops and they can come pick him up, he's not going to run from the cops in his sleep so why resort to killing him? Killing child molesters and those involved in child porn is too easy, let them rot in a cell for the next 50 years and let the inmates beat the crap out of them don't just kill them instantly and let them off the hook.
On one hand you have a guy who "may have" been watching child porn (we don't even know if he broke a law or not) while in the other hand we have a psycho lady who stabbed and killed a man in his sleep (a definite crime). Why is the "may have" guy getting treated like a scum when theres no proof but the actual murderer is being called a hero?
For those that think the lady did right in killing Matthew White you are sorely mistaken. She took the time to even plan out the stabbing by bringing the knives into the bedroom and waiting until he fell asleep. You mean to tell me that in that amount of time she couldn't have contacted the police once and let them do their job? Thats the problem today people think they know best and can take the law into their own hands, it doesn't matter what somebody did you have zero right to kill them, the only time murder is ever acceptable is in self defense and your life was truly in danger. Not a single soul was harmed by Matthew White so why was he killed as if there was somebody he was harming?
agreed. I could maybe see it if she caught him and in a fury killed him or if he attacked her or something, but what she did is premeditated murder... plain and simple. She obviously feels that she did the right thing and saved some kids directly or something... hopefully that illusion in her head gets her though her life in prison.
-
I would harldy call a wife or girlfriend catching her spouse vigilantes roaming.Again if you caught someone close to you doing this horrible act or worse would you want to talk it out and give a pat on the back???
I was assuming that if you were okay with the wife doing this that you would be okay with anyone doing it no matter what the relation.
Who ever even eluded that they would "talk it out and pat him on the back."?! I said she should have turned him in or maybe grab his computer and take it to the police and let them investigate. If you think any of us against her murdering her husband because she thinks he was watching child porn thinks that she should have looked the other way and talked it out with him you are not understanding our points. I absolutely don't think that she should have looked the other way. She should have taken the proper course of action given that at the time no one's life was in danger.
If a I catch a friend or relative of mine doing something like this I'm not going to murder them, that's for sure.
-
-
Until more of the facts come out I'm going to reserve judgement on this particular case but I will say this anyone who sexually abuses a child needs to be tourted and executed and anyone who gets their jollies off from watching kids get sexually abused is just as guilty as the ones who are physically abusing them.
-
I respect your opinion but IF it was child porn and she waited and stabbed him in his sleep GOOD JOB.And that is just the way I see it.
I'm sorry but GOOD JOB??? Really???
So anybody who looks at underage pictures deserves to be killed no questions asked? Harmless people who did nothing other than look at a picture? I can't justify the killing of somebody who has only looked at pictures. Now to those who set up and take the pictures and physically get involved in the act of child porn thats another story as they are true scum, but harmless people who only look at a pictures? I don't know if looking at pictures is justifiable enough to result in murder.
-
-
I would harldy call a wife or girlfriend catching her spouse vigilantes roaming.Again if you caught someone close to you doing this horrible act or worse would you want to talk it out and give a pat on the back???
If I caught somebody close to me viewing child porn I would contact the police and let them take care of it, NOT KILL THEM!!!
-
Until more of the facts come out I'm going to reserve judgement on this particular case but I will say this anyone who sexually abuses a child needs to be tourted and executed and anyone who gets their jollies off from watching kids get sexually abused is just as guilty as the ones who are physically abusing them.
-
Harmless???????? OK you have your views I have mine we can let it go at that
I'm sorry but GOOD JOB??? Really???
So anybody who looks at underage pictures deserves to be killed no questions asked? Harmless people who did nothing other than look at a picture? I can't justify the killing of somebody who has only looked at pictures. Now to those who set up and take the pictures and physically get involved in the act of child porn thats another story as they are true scum, but harmless people who only look at a pictures? I don't know if looking at pictures is justifiable enough to result in murder.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules