-
01-31-2011, 06:30 PM #1Writing Team
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 1,172
- Country

- Card Cash
- 885.00
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaObamacare ruled unconstitutional... again.
And so the game is tied at 2: two rulings for, two rulings against.
http://www.sfexaminer.com/blogs/belt...constitutional
Funny how the neocons only complain about activist judges when it suits their agenda.
-
-
01-31-2011, 11:05 PM #2Assistant General Manager



- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 15,720
- Country

- Card Cash
- 6,542.80
- Savings
- 0.00
- Blog Entries
- 6 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaLast edited by duane1969; 01-31-2011 at 11:07 PM.
-
01-31-2011, 11:12 PM #3Writing Team
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 1,172
- Country

- Card Cash
- 885.00
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaNot sure where the previous rulings were made. Doesn't really matter because it's 99.999% certain to head to the SCOTUS.
And come on now, haven't we established the fact that claiming "BUT THE OTHER SIDE DOES IT TOO!" doesn't make it acceptable? Sucks having the tables turned on you, doesn't it?
-
02-01-2011, 12:27 AM #4


- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 14,857
- Country

- Card Cash
- 398.25
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaI have to agree. I think it is the first federal ruling. Have to say Im not surprised that it came from Florida. It should be common knowledge though that this was going to make the supreme court sooner or later.
-
02-01-2011, 01:33 PM #5Assistant General Manager



- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 15,720
- Country

- Card Cash
- 6,542.80
- Savings
- 0.00
- Blog Entries
- 6 View my Inventory New
View my store Beta
-
02-01-2011, 09:18 PM #6
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 9,374
- Country

- Card Cash
- 125.00
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaI personally don't think there are many things that people should be forced to purchase if they chose not too. Healthcare needs reforming but forcing everyone to buy a product from a group that happens to be a large lobby of the entity doing the forcing doesn't seem all that right. I get that people need certain insurance when it comes to driving a vehicle that can hurt or kill another person or damage their property, but no circumstance comes to mind that would harm another person if an individual doesn't have health insurance for himself/herself. I guess one could make a claim that a parent should have health insurance for their child, but I'm not exactly sure how I feel about that being a law.
BUYING BULK PLAYER LOTS (MLB/NBA/NFL/NASCAR)
Hidden Content
Check out my NEW FaceBook Fan page of my abstract painting and graphic design work!!!
Hidden Content





eBay Pages
Need help REWARD FOR BEST ANSWER
Hi I have some questions that l hope will be answered. I'm going to a baseball game this Sunday and Monday and I was wondering whats a good way to get players attenion to sign and whats a good...
05-21-2013, 02:36 PM in patsgetgronked