Results 61 to 70 of 82
-
07-11-2011, 05:24 PM #61
Seriously? I just read a post of yours in another thread where your only argument is that a POSSIBLE political CANDIDATE MIGHT INTRODUCE a bill that would POSSIBLY push a Christian agenda...and now you're mocking someone for suggesting an ELECTED PRESIDENT might push through his agenda via executive order, which he has been known to do on many occasions?
Consistency.
-
-
07-11-2011, 05:27 PM #62
Heres a good Bush one
Executive Order 13397, signed by President George W. Bush on March 7, 2006, concerns the "Responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security with Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives". The executive order directs the Department of Homeland Security to "coordinate a national effort to expand opportunities for faith-based and other community organizations and to strengthen their capacity to better meet America's social and community needs."
Why does Homeland Security need to be involved in faith based initatives ?
-
07-11-2011, 05:28 PM #63
No I'm mocking you for failing to provide any evidence rebuting my claim, and instead just launching in on a unsubstantiated attack on the President. Even after I provided a quote from the adminirtation showing they were less then enthusiatic about making any changes to current gun laws.
-
-
07-11-2011, 05:30 PM #64
+ I don't see the President signing any "christian values pledges" that push a fundementalist christian agenda.
-
07-11-2011, 07:07 PM #65
Because they perform charitable acts in the midst of crisis and catastrophic situations. It is common practice for law enforcement agencies to work hand-in-hand with groups like the Salvation Army and the Christian Relief Fund.
They have to put stuff in like that because if they don't then some idiot comes along and complains when they work with a faith-based charity and the next thing you know somebody is suing the government for not abiding by seperation of church and state.
-
-
07-11-2011, 10:33 PM #66
Lol, now who would do that??
-
07-12-2011, 01:41 AM #67
There isn't one single mention of any type of disaster assistance in this EO
http://cryptome.org/eo13397.htm
-
-
07-12-2011, 04:46 PM #68
Looks like congress is illrelenvent !
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obam...new-gun-rules/
-
07-12-2011, 04:58 PM #69
If they actually wanted to stop the flow of weapons into the Mexican drug wars, why have they been sitting aside watching them be bought and smuggled across the border for months now?
Agenda.
Yesterday at 5:19p...wow, didn't take long to have to eat those words, huh?
-
07-12-2011, 06:12 PM #70
Those illegal weapons that criminals use were once owned by someone legal whoever it was. And since the criminal element keeps getting their hands on weapons then a tighter grip on gun laws are justified as the ones we have are not working.
-