Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Obama's Third Party

  
  1. #1





    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,958
    SCF Rewards
    601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Transferred Feedback
    Bench (376)
    Country
    See AUTaxMan's Items on eBay


  2. #2





    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    9,094
    SCF Rewards
    1,058
    Country
    See spaz4's Items on eBay

    2 things:

    1. While I don't doubt his claim, I would still like to see the actual minutes/contracts he talks about.

    2. Even if he was a member of the "New Party", which I'm not familiar with, but the author deems as Socialist, that still doesn't changed the way he's governed so far. And judging by his record, he's not a Socialist. He's not even close. If you ask an ACTUAL Socialist if they think Obama is one of them, they laugh.

  3. #3





    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,958
    SCF Rewards
    601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Transferred Feedback
    Bench (376)
    Country
    See AUTaxMan's Items on eBay

    2 things:

    1. While I don't doubt his claim, I would still like to see the actual minutes/contracts he talks about.

    2. Even if he was a member of the "New Party", which I'm not familiar with, but the author deems as Socialist, that still doesn't changed the way he's governed so far. And judging by his record, he's not a Socialist. He's not even close. If you ask an ACTUAL Socialist if they think Obama is one of them, they laugh.

    Governing as an actual socialist would be political suicide. If he is re-elected, you'll see some actual socialism.

  4. #4





    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    9,094
    SCF Rewards
    1,058
    Country
    See spaz4's Items on eBay

    Governing as an actual socialist would be political suicide. If he is re-elected, you'll see some actual socialism.

    Well I'll take a gentleman's bet that we won't

  5. #5





    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,958
    SCF Rewards
    601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Transferred Feedback
    Bench (376)
    Country
    See AUTaxMan's Items on eBay

    Well I'll take a gentleman's bet that we won't

    He won't beat Romney.

  6. #6




    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,559
    SCF Rewards
    400
    Country

    2. Even if he was a member of the "New Party", which I'm not familiar with, but the author deems as Socialist, that still doesn't changed the way he's governed so far. And judging by his record, he's not a Socialist. He's not even close. If you ask an ACTUAL Socialist if they think Obama is one of them, they laugh.

    This is the only thing that needs to be said in response to the utterly irrelevant article.

    Governing as an actual socialist would be political suicide. If he is re-elected, you'll see some actual socialism.

    HA!

    WOW, is this what you guys (GOP) actually believe?

    WOW, I mean, this is straight up hilarious, If Obama were to be re-elected and become socialist then I'm going to RE-convert to being a christian.

    DO you want to know the odds of that actually happening???

    Well I'll take a gentleman's bet that we won't

    SO WOULD I!

    In fact I would bet all my worldly possessions on that bet. (Including my 1986 Fleer RC Jordan)



    ....Yeah, I got one of those bad boys! :-)

    He won't beat Romney.

    Can I see his birth certificate first?

    I demand to see it!!!

    I believe America is being duped by a MEXICAN-MORMON-DOG ABUSING-UNAMERICAN who wants to DESTROY this country!

  7. #7




    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    46
    Posts
    10,025
    SCF Rewards
    400
    Country
    See duwal's Items on eBay

    He won't beat Romney.


    disagree, know of plenty of Republicans across the country that would rather stick with what Obama is doing for four more years over risking Romney being in charge

  8. #8




    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    43
    Posts
    15,687
    SCF Rewards
    913
    Blog Entries
    2
    Country
    See onepimptiger's Items on eBay

    2 things:

    1. While I don't doubt his claim, I would still like to see the actual minutes/contracts he talks about.

    2. Even if he was a member of the "New Party", which I'm not familiar with, but the author deems as Socialist, that still doesn't changed the way he's governed so far. And judging by his record, he's not a Socialist. He's not even close. If you ask an ACTUAL Socialist if they think Obama is one of them, they laugh.

    For some people here, it's no surprise they haven't heard about actual facts...but I'm surprised you haven't heard this before. Apparently it's too old to still be found (meaning pre-2010), but I posted an extensive thread about this long ago. The Internet Archive (a completely non-partisan site which has archived copies of web pages since the internet began) has copies of the New Party's website showing meeting roll calls with Obama's name, listing him as an active member, and even noting him as a rising star in the party as recently as the mid-2000s. The New Party scrubbed their records of any Obama references during the 2008 campaign, but the Internet Archive has documented it well for posterity.

  9. #9




    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,119
    SCF Rewards
    160
    Country
    See bbra9027's Items on eBay

    He won't beat Romney.


    I doubt it too. Romney is running as a moderate instead of the usual republican extremist. The only problem is the moderates are sticking with Obama and Romney has already lost the vote of republican extremists due to a lot of factors including his religion.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

  10. #10





    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,958
    SCF Rewards
    601
    Blog Entries
    1
    Transferred Feedback
    Bench (376)
    Country
    See AUTaxMan's Items on eBay

    This is the only thing that needs to be said in response to the utterly irrelevant article.

    Why is it irrelevant?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on