Results 1 to 10 of 99
07-23-2012, 04:23 PM #1
Jim Henson company and chick fil a sever ties over restaurant's anti gay views
07-23-2012, 04:56 PM #2
Great to see this. I have stopped eating there.
07-24-2012, 10:40 AM #3
you guys do realize that the people working there are americans who need work? the employees will be the only ones to suffer when they start to downsize do to lack of business and I am sure all are not with chick fil a on this one, but they got to work!
07-24-2012, 10:41 AM #4
I doubt any boycott will significantly affect their sales.
07-24-2012, 10:44 AM #5
07-24-2012, 11:08 AM #6
that must be nice to not NEED to work
07-24-2012, 11:11 AM #7
You know what.....I'm doing a 180 on this and supporting the Boycott....
While some people might think this is hypocritical after the whole "Gay Oreos" nonsense, the big difference is that Chick-Fil-A is practicing EXCLUSION in their blatant BIGOTRY towards the gay community.
The Oreo thing was trying to support INCLUSION and thus the two sides are about RIGHT and WRONG.
It is WRONG for Chick-Fil-A to be Anti-gay and I'm glad that the Jim Henson company severed their ties with such a despicable company.
I said before I would still eat at Chick-Fil-A.....but after carefully reading the comments said by the President and watching how wrong this really is....I have changed my mind.
Last edited by JustAlex; 07-24-2012 at 11:13 AM.
07-24-2012, 11:15 AM #8
No chick fil a, is not a human and cannot exclude anyone, it is the owner views, which he has the rights to, but not the workers nor the suppliers who will bethe only ones to lose out in the end.
07-24-2012, 11:17 AM #9
What does it mean to be "anti-gay"? What did CFA do to get the "anti-gay" label?
07-24-2012, 11:24 AM #10