Results 1 to 5 of 5
11-09-2012, 10:19 PM #1
Nate Silver.....a shining example of why Math is better than clownish punditry!
^I personally talked a lot about Nate Silver on election day, and I felt confident that Obama would win because a REAL statistician and a man who understands polls, probabilities, and numbers was properly able to make a formula which said that Obama had a 90%+ chance of winning the election.
Meanwhile CLOWNISH PUNDITS such as Dick Morris and Karl Rove were saying that they had a "good feeling" that Romney would win!
Dick Morris said Romney would win in a "Landslide"!
Pay attention GOP and Dems.....Math, Science, Stats, don't have any bias, they hold much more weight than partisan nonsense!
Science and Math FTW!!!Science doesn't know everything.....Religion doesn't know anything.
11-10-2012, 01:37 AM #2
To be honest.. when Silver shows a republican will win using the same math.. democrats will try to discredit him just like republicans have for the last 5 years. People will always see what they want to see, and his math will still be around 95% right like its been thus far.For an updated look at what I have for sale or trade please click my eBay User ID.... usually thousands of items available in all genre's
11-10-2012, 12:36 PM #3
11-10-2012, 06:51 PM #4
Well, I DID mention the Dems as well.....seeing as I'm independent I have no allegiance towards them.
The thing is that, I saw many liberal pundits that were going by the polls, meanwhile the conservative pundits were going by their "guts" and "feelings".
It's ridiculous!Science doesn't know everything.....Religion doesn't know anything.
11-10-2012, 07:51 PM #5
"Pundit" is a more made up job than "Social Media Expert""Luckily for us both I am intellectually above immature shallowness."
Baahahahahahahaha...oh, you were serious...