Papa Johns prefers to give away 2 million pizzas than insure his employees!

[tpeichel]

So you're saying that a big business is benefitting from this?
So what are Republicans complaining about? They love big business.

I've stopped trying to understand the Republicans.

[MadMan1978]

Totally deserved

[shrewsbury]

or better yet, he decides to keep his business from sinking by not getting stuck with some unfair government regulations!!!

what a crazy guy!!!!!!!!

[drtom2005]

Although you appear to be talking about responsibility in healthy decision-making, I think the key to reforming healthcare is responsibility in spending. If you make healthcare truly portable, where individuals are choosing their plans and writing the checks, not their employers, you will see much more responsibility in health care spending by individuals. When people are aware of these costs, they make more healthy decisions.

Same goes for taxes. If you make everyone pay income taxes, even just a little, they will have a greater appreciation of the system and realization of the costs.

Like Milton Friedman said, there are four ways to spend money...

I disagree on this issue. People should be required to pay disaster insurance. If someone gets extremely ill, I shouldn't have to pay for it. They should have the coverage for it.

[Wickabee]

If his business is sinking, he should give away $12million in product. Just a thought.

He gets no sympathy from me on this. Not for partisan reasons, Jay, but because a man who could use my house as a doorstop is complaining it's too expensive. No one is saying regulations, everyone is saying it costs ME too much.

[MadMan1978]

or better yet, he decides to keep his business from sinking by not getting stuck with some unfair government regulations!!!

what a crazy guy!!!!!!!!

Jay no matter how you wish to see it it is nothing but greed...
If the company was not turning profit, he didnt have a 40,000 square foot house...I could see this being an issue.
But they are doing well. and he doesnt wish to comply with the law.

In the long run it is the best thing for his employees and Society
And this would not sink his business...not even close!
The photos piece is wrong it isnt now down to under a nickel a pie?

But the mere chatting on him only helps his marketing.

[AUTaxMan]

Jay no matter how you wish to see it it is nothing but greed...
If the company was not turning profit, he didnt have a 40,000 square foot house...I could see this being an issue.
But they are doing well. and he doesnt wish to comply with the law.

In the long run it is the best thing for his employees and Society
And this would not sink his business...not even close!
The photos piece is wrong it isnt now down to under a nickel a pie?

But the mere chatting on him only helps his marketing.

He actually is complying with the law. Who is the arbiter of what constitutes greed, by the way?

[Wickabee]

He actually is complying with the law. Who is the arbiter of what constitutes greed, by the way?

So because no one has the credentials to decide what constitutes greed it doesn't exit?
Good argument.

[MadMan1978]

He actually is complying with the law. Who is the arbiter of what constitutes greed, by the way?

YOu are correct...like Wal Mart he side steps the law
Finds the means to work around it...

and you ask that question?
For the lack of abetter word he is GREEDY!

and in this Case GREED ISNT GOOD!


If he was a REAL Business man...

He would find the ways and means to be able to cover his employees. and still make a nice profit. But his Politics and yes GREED get in the way. This could have been a huge positive for him and his company...but he did he chose? And Brandon I call the way i see it and it is plain GREED!

[Wickabee]

Wrong. No one is qualified to put a number on greed, there for, greed does not exist.