Results 1 to 10 of 16
11-30-2012, 02:19 PM #1
Bizarre sports card insurace case
Nothing in this article adds up
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/...=2012311290056Dolphins Collection: 8760+ Total Cards (1200+ AU & GU)Derek Hagan Collection: 385 Cards<------Click on View My Inventory to take a look.
11-30-2012, 03:55 PM #2
Very strange indeed. Sounds like the jury was the only sensible party in this whole things, awarding him nothing.Currently Collecting: 2000 Upper Deck Legends football autos (39/67 - 58% complete) and 2010 Limited Material Monikers (29/48 - 60% complete)
11-30-2012, 05:16 PM #3
"But Prendergast’s response was this: Why, if evidence of the collection was so lacking, did Pacific provide insurance in the first place?"
This is what I was wondering myself...
11-30-2012, 10:07 PM #4
If nothing else, this proves the value of having a Photobucket account and especially an updated Beckett account once a year or so to keep inventory and insured values.
11-30-2012, 10:20 PM #5
Don't mistake assertiveness for desperation. Just because I don't play the games 99% of the folks on here do doesn't mean I'm up to something.
12-01-2012, 08:33 AM #6
Not much I hate worse than crooks and insurance companies though they are pretty much one in the same.Steve Schindler
Collect what you want to collect. Collect players and cards that you like. Collect what you can afford. Collect for you, not to try to impress someone else. If you do this you will much more likely to enjoy the hobby and stay with it.
12-01-2012, 09:14 AM #7
12-01-2012, 11:57 AM #8
Right, I have 300K of insurance on the stuff IN my house, but my insurance company doesn't have a clue what that "stuff" is. They would assume it is furniture, appliances, clothes, jewelry, home entertainment, some minor collection etc etc, but they ask us for no proof of ownership until something happens and I file a claim. They will take my money every month and if something happens, God forbid, they will pay. Unless I make some ridiculous claim like - oh yea in addition to all of that, I had a $200,00o diamond in my wife's closet that I have no proof of - please pay me. The answer would be NO!
And it makes sense!I don't care if you need a week to ship! Perspective.
12-01-2012, 02:27 PM #9
While I agree with the decision. I think they should have at least refunded the guy the money he paid into the insurance.
12-01-2012, 02:49 PM #10
i dont think the guy she be refunded he tried to rip them off and he had to put some cash into do it... So because his attempt didn't work we should give him back the money for his risk of top make a quick $4 mil..
Look at that guys picture, and the circumstances no way that guy had $450 k to drop into cards... it's just false all aroundHidden Content
Buying: High end Sam Bradford, NEED PEYTON MANNING CONTENDERS, Whatever catches my eye from premium brands
Buying: Derek Jeter, Babe Ruth AUTOS