12-12-2012, 06:34 PM #1
is a psa 10 rick nash young gun a solid investment
need your thoughts or should i go with a crosby young gun psa 10 one is short printed
and the crosby well population report there is over 250 psa 10s out there your opinions would be appreciated
12-12-2012, 07:35 PM #2
12-12-2012, 07:52 PM #3
Depends on the price. The Crosby may not get it's money back until after you are dead. You really have to think of that. If you want to leave a legacy, then go that route.
Both I think will be severely overpriced. Since the Lockout, new collectors have lost touch with reality when it comes to cards prices. Everyone thinks that their cards are 5 Grand Each.Collecting many HOF Cards, Old OPC, Old Parkhurst, Old Topps.
Want List:Hidden Content
12-13-2012, 01:22 AM #4
lol i dont think you have to wait that long to get your money back psa 10 crosby can be had for less than 500 i think 10 years from now it should be worth triple that
12-13-2012, 11:10 PM #5
Crosby!Collecting anything habs and all goaltenders for my son.
12-14-2012, 09:12 AM #6
12-14-2012, 09:54 AM #7
Hockey cards as an investment in general is a bad idea....but I agree with Fritz, and as someone who lives in Columbus, the Nash boat has sailedHidden Content
EVERYTHING in bucket is for sale
12-17-2012, 05:39 AM #8
12-17-2012, 03:21 PM #9
I would avoid PSA 10 in general. I've owned several PSA 10 YG over the years and most of them wouldn't get a BGS 9 from Beckett. PSA is horrible for modern cards IMO.
12-17-2012, 04:21 PM #10
Will disagree here, Nash YG holds great value still under high grades
only a 50$ difference, and there are MANY more Crosby YGs out there than Nash
and there are crosbys that have gone best offer for the same price
Collecting Toronto Maple Leafs Forever Rivals Base and Inserts!
Need Base and Inserts: NONE! COMPLETE Hidden Content