12-12-2012, 05:34 PM #1
is a psa 10 rick nash young gun a solid investment
need your thoughts or should i go with a crosby young gun psa 10 one is short printed
and the crosby well population report there is over 250 psa 10s out there your opinions would be appreciated
12-12-2012, 06:35 PM #2
12-12-2012, 06:52 PM #3
Depends on the price. The Crosby may not get it's money back until after you are dead. You really have to think of that. If you want to leave a legacy, then go that route.
Both I think will be severely overpriced. Since the Lockout, new collectors have lost touch with reality when it comes to cards prices. Everyone thinks that their cards are 5 Grand Each.Collecting many HOF Cards, Old OPC, Old Parkhurst, Old Topps.
Want List:Hidden Content
12-13-2012, 12:22 AM #4
lol i dont think you have to wait that long to get your money back psa 10 crosby can be had for less than 500 i think 10 years from now it should be worth triple that
12-13-2012, 10:10 PM #5
Crosby!Collecting anything habs and all goaltenders for my son.
12-14-2012, 08:12 AM #6
12-14-2012, 08:54 AM #7
Hockey cards as an investment in general is a bad idea....but I agree with Fritz, and as someone who lives in Columbus, the Nash boat has sailedHidden Content
EVERYTHING in bucket is for sale
12-17-2012, 04:39 AM #8
12-17-2012, 02:21 PM #9
I would avoid PSA 10 in general. I've owned several PSA 10 YG over the years and most of them wouldn't get a BGS 9 from Beckett. PSA is horrible for modern cards IMO.
12-17-2012, 03:21 PM #10
Will disagree here, Nash YG holds great value still under high grades
only a 50$ difference, and there are MANY more Crosby YGs out there than Nash
and there are crosbys that have gone best offer for the same price
Collecting 13-14 Upper Deck Series 1 Shining Stars RAINBOWS: 21/50 (42% complete)