01-22-2013, 08:16 AM #1
i know im not the only one that feels this way....
Lately I've started to notice that I really prefer on card autos instead of a sticker that's been autographed Nd stuck on a card. Does anybody else feel this way also? Opinions?
01-22-2013, 10:41 AM #2
I think you will find that most if not all prefer on card autos. Those damn stickers make the cards look ugly and take away from the card.
01-22-2013, 05:08 PM #3
Yeah they really are ugly. They look kinda tacky in a way also.
01-22-2013, 05:12 PM #4
Yeah there are some sticker autographs that are okay but most of them look horribleTrade Bucket: Hidden Content
01-22-2013, 06:45 PM #5
I like on-card too, but to be honest I liked the 2002-2006 giant silver stickers rather than the tiny clear ones they use now.Hidden Content
Rohan Davey PC 211/264 (non 1/1)
Trindon Holliday 29/36
Amir Sadollah 62/69 (4/24 1/1's)
01-22-2013, 06:51 PM #6
Not a big fan of the sticker autos. Sometimes debris or lint will cling on to the sticker and you cannot remove it. Also, players will sometime sign the autograph off of the sticker and it looks ugly. I did like the Bowman Sterling sticker autos from a few years ago though.Baseball - SF Giants, Texas Rangers, Yoenis Cespedes, Roberto Clemente
Basketball - GS Warriors, Michael Jordan, Monta Ellis
Football - SF 49ers, Dan Marino, PC'ing ERIC REID
01-22-2013, 10:33 PM #7
01-23-2013, 11:21 AM #8
the only sticker auto's that I like and tolerate are the ones that are embedded into the card like this
01-23-2013, 01:05 PM #9
02-01-2013, 04:59 PM #10
Plus theres no fingerprints from the player on the card since they never actually touch it, i dont like them