-
01-30-2013, 04:38 PM #1



- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 21,856
- Country

- Card Cash
- 4,498.00
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store Beta
Former commissioner Fay Vincent favors lifetime ban for PED users
http://aol.sportingnews.com/mlb/stor...6pLid%3D263698
Count former Major League Baseball commissioner Fay Vincent among those who believe a lifetime ban would be just punishment for major leaguers who test positive for performance-enhancing drugs.
“I would throw anybody out of the game after a failed test,” Vincent told USA Today, in reaction to the news Tuesday that MLB was investigating what could blossom into a new steroids scandal.
Vincent led the investigation into Pete Rose’s gambling and became commissioner shortly after Rose was banned from the game in 1989. Vincent has maintained his stance that Rose should not be reinstated.
“People knew that if we can throw out a guy like Rose, who acted so arrogant, we can do it to anybody who gambles,” Vincent told USA Today. “So why not for steroids? Why give them three bites of that apple?
“(A lifetime ban) is a very effective deterrent. It’s like the Saudis cutting off an arm if you steal somebody’s wallet. You see one guy walking around without a wrist, it stops you.”
One problem with such a zero-tolerance policy is the possibility of banning a player who truly didn’t know he was taking an illegal substance. With more than 125 substances on the list of banned PEDs, it is possible.
“A lifetime ban is a really harsh outcome for violators that didn’t do it maliciously or with intent,” a long-time agent told Sporting News on Tuesday. “There are too many Latin players that have ‘taken’ these banned substances in things like cough medicine and bacterial creams in their countries.”Trade Bucket: Hidden Content
-
02-01-2013, 10:02 AM #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 10,043
- Country

- Card Cash
- 503.40
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaTotaly agree with this.
-
02-01-2013, 12:08 PM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Posts
- 124
- Country

- Card Cash
- 4.00
- Savings
- 0.00
- Transferred Feedback
- BO(28)
View my Inventory New
View my store BetaOne and done is harsh, especially with someone who may not have taken something knowingly. But the "three strikes" policy is too lenient. I say, first offense, you get suspended for a year, without pay. Second offense, banishment. That first offense would open up some eyes.
Collecting 1974 Topps (84% complete) and 1957-2013 Topps Phillies cards (50.2% complete).
PC's: Chase Utley, Mark Trumbo, & David Price.
My Bucket: Hidden Content
My Haves/Wants Lists (still a work in progress): Hidden Content
As of 3/16/13, no PWE's please. I use DC; so should you.
-
02-02-2013, 02:06 AM #4

- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 1,985
- Country

- Card Cash
- 241.85
- Savings
- 0.00 View my Inventory New
View my store BetaI think a year for the first offense is too harsh.
Athletes are careful in what they ingest, or rub on their bodies, but no matter how vigilant, sometimes things can slip through.
First offense-50 games
Second offense-A year
Third offense-bye bye
No way that Manny Ramirez should be back in the Majors.Hidden Content
Formerly lambeausouth
Hi, I'm Bill. Cheesehead by birth. Packer and Brewer fanatic by choice.
I will treat all SCF members with respect. I ask that you please do the same.


Reply With Quote


eBay Pages
Need help REWARD FOR BEST ANSWER
Hi I have some questions that l hope will be answered. I'm going to a baseball game this Sunday and Monday and I was wondering whats a good way to get players attenion to sign and whats a good...
05-21-2013, 02:36 PM in patsgetgronked