02-12-2013, 08:36 AM #1
Weeden Already Done In Cleveland?
I was reading an article about the possibility of Mike Wallace landing in Cleveland and saw this at the end.
Should Wallace land in Cleveland, it's a good bet that he will not be catching passes from quarterback Brandon Weeden. Per La Canfora, the new Browns regime "badly wants to upgrade" on the 2012 first-round pick. New VP of player personnel Michael Lombardi allegedly called the Weeden selection a "panicked disaster" last offseason.
02-12-2013, 09:39 AM #2
Sounds like they are looking at flacco. Yikes. Flacco only had 500 more yards then weeden and a qb rating of 88 vs 73. Not sure that is worth 20 plus mill.......Collecting patches and autos of Buckeyes, SF Giants, SF 49ers,Browns, Indians, Cavs. Kevin Randleman and Mark Coleman items....
Check the bucket for trades.....
The argument can't be broken!
02-12-2013, 10:00 AM #3
Doesn't relly matter who the QB is. If the best receivers they have is Greg Little and Josh Gordon then it is silly to expect too much. Flacco produced 500 more yards and 7 more TDs than Weeden with Boldin, Smith and Pitta to throw to. Even if the Browns add Mike Wallace, he is a speed guy, not a route runner.
02-12-2013, 11:20 AM #4
02-12-2013, 11:39 AM #5
was weeden that bad? Yikes, thats all I am pulling lately! Well, thought I was pulling decent hits, but it looks like I have still have been pulling scrubs.Go Gators and Bears!
I only collect Justin Blackmon and I guess I am getting in the SUPER collector range of Alshon Jeffery! Over 40 autos and rising!
02-12-2013, 12:00 PM #6
The issue is that the Browns invested a 1st round pick in a QB that will be 30 years old before he has played 20 games. In fact, he turns 30 the day after his 16th game. How do you plan for the future when your QB of the future will be thinking retirement in 5 years?
02-12-2013, 10:03 PM #7
weeden did well for his rookie year. the browns are stupid. they draft a new qb on average every 2 years over the last 12 years. WHY? after over a decade they keep doing the same things. develope the guy you have and build a freakin team around him instead of blowing every first round pick on another qb. get a good wr or 2. get another running back to compliment richardson. that will help them more than anything. im glad im not a browns fan.pc is spectra spectra spectra
02-12-2013, 11:41 PM #8
02-13-2013, 10:02 AM #9
I think the Mets could use some pitching if Weeden is available.
02-13-2013, 10:17 AM #10
talent or lack of talent aside, i think the guys age is huge concern. isn't he turning 30 soon? so you have to build a contending team and win it all within 5 years before he goes geriatric in football years? good luck.Banner For BucketHidden ContentLooking For: Gronkowski, Brady, 2011 Certified