Missouri bill redefines science....tries to implement "intelligent design"

[MadMan1978]

Scientific Theory (loosely defined)
a theory that explains scientific observations; "scientific theories must be falsifiable"


and to define
Hypothesis Noun
-A supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.
-A proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth.

well Jay sorry to say you are wrong
and NO I did not use Wikipedia


So what part are you really against ? the Messenger or the Message?

I think this is a valid argument, as well as being thankful I do not live in Missouri

I find it very damaging to real education to push Religious views in public schools. There are proper places to teach creationism. Hence since it is from your Bible then it should be in Sunday Schools or Catholic Schools. Or it that you all object that since Alex posted the story you have to attack his no religion choice?

[shrewsbury]

well Jay sorry to say you are wrong

wrong about what?


and if the Big Bang and Human Evolution can be taught in public school, so should creationsim and ID and just about anything else.

[MadMan1978]

wrong about what?


and if the Big Bang and Human Evolution can be taught in public school, so should creationism and ID and just about anything else.

What basis in SCIENCE do you have top prove your creationism?

and your wrong in your definitions and thank you for not replying to the real aspect of the post. nice deflection.

Creationism is pushing religion, not in Public schools!

[shrewsbury]

they are hypothesis so neither have the ultimate empirical proof, neither, not just religion.

how was I wrong on my definition?

and my original post stated I agreed that this was stupid, so no deflection.

and why can't religion be in school? because you are afraid of it? because you believe it is so powerful all will succumb to it and follow like a pack of zombies?

there is no law or reason religion cannot be in school, just people are afraid of being wrong, so they push it away at all costs. religion is not anti science just like science is not anti God.

just angry people like you who freak out over the idea of a creator for no good reason. and if you are right then there would be no need to try and get rid of religion, because all people would know that there is no proof, so why would they ever believe?

[MadMan1978]

and I want to add this in...Jenkem says it so well...

[MadMan1978]

they are hypothesis so neither have the ultimate empirical proof, neither, not just religion.

how was I wrong on my definition?

and my original post stated I agreed that this was stupid, so no deflection.

and why can't religion be in school? because you are afraid of it? because you believe it is so powerful all will succumb to it and follow like a pack of zombies?

there is no law or reason religion cannot be in school, just people are afraid of being wrong, so they push it away at all costs. religion is not anti science just like science is not anti God.

just angry people like you who freak out over the idea of a creator for no good reason. and if you are right then there would be no need to try and get rid of religion, because all people would know that there is no proof, so why would they ever believe?

The only fear I have is YOUR Religion will teach the wrong things as they have for years! Hence the reason why NO RELIGION should be in the public schools....

and that is where i leave this thread. Your insults shows once again your religious arrogance.

[Wickabee]

The only fear I have is YOUR Religion will teach the wrong things as they have for years! Hence the reason why NO RELIGION should be in the public schools....

and that is where i leave this thread. Your insults shows once again your religious arrogance.

"Angry" is an insult now?
People be gettin' sensitive 'round here!