Results 1 to 10 of 14
03-12-2013, 02:16 PM #1
The higher end product and 1/1 question
Just curious as to peoples opinion on this.
How would you rank these 2012 Football products?
And my question about the 1/1...
What makes product A's Andrew Luck patch auto 1/1 worth more than product B's Andrew Luck patch auto 1/1?
They both have the same rarity right?
The reason I'm asking is because I pulled a 1/1 Panini BLACK Prime Signatures NFL Shield and was noticing that the Topps Chrome
superfractor auto of the same player sold for $3050, and I'm just curious if it's value is in the same ball park....
Thanks for your opinion in advance!
03-12-2013, 02:38 PM #2
Superfractors control the market, they are the highest sought after cards. A Black 1/1 wouldn't be compariable in my opnion. If it is a game worn logoshield auto, it would probably be compariable, but I would guess that it is event worn. Still sounds like a great hit though.
03-12-2013, 10:12 PM #3
I never understood this.. Why would anyone want a Super refractor for that price when they can get the logo shield + a low #d auto for cheaper... If I was a collector I would spend more on your card then that Chrome 1/1. That's just me though.
03-13-2013, 10:13 AM #4
03-13-2013, 11:46 AM #5
Here is the link to an article that talks about it.
03-13-2013, 05:51 PM #6
I think it depends on what you want to collect. The value to everyone is going to be different. I personal prefer Rookie Patch Autos. I don't buy certian products because they don't have patch autos. I LOVE crown royale, think it might be my favorite product. Black is nice too because every pack you get a rookie patch auto.
03-13-2013, 08:46 PM #7
Im more into traditional cards so all these super thick patch cards, I really don't see them as cards. They are more miniature framed pieces of jersey that may or may not have autos, to me at least. For me there is nothing better than a regular looking card with a nice on-card auto. This could be other collectors view on it too.
But in reality it has to do with Chromes longevity on the hobby. Chrome and Contenders are sets that we can depend on from year to year, just like SPA used to be until UD lost the license. The rest of the products may or may not be around next year and even if they do have some following they have very little chance to last more than 5 years. Collectors like to be able to compare a rc from the past to a current one and the best and easiest way to do that is from a set that they both have a rc in.
03-13-2013, 10:07 PM #8
And as far as the rating you are asking for, i would put black and supreme as 1a and 1b, chrome as 2 and SP a very distant 1000000. I don't like product without the license
03-19-2013, 10:13 AM #9
Thanks for all your input guys! Helps me out a lot!
03-19-2013, 11:00 AM #10