Results 11 to 20 of 47
03-14-2013, 03:51 PM #11
I have known many gay women in my lifetime. I would have thought the ratio was closer to 50/50. That being said, I see nothing wrong with allocating money to any study that looks to solve the obesity problem in society.
03-14-2013, 04:05 PM #12
so you think sexual preference is related to body fat?
how about that money be spent on why women were fat?
03-14-2013, 04:19 PM #13
03-14-2013, 06:17 PM #14
"Amidst the uncertainties of war, every soldier is entitled to one certainty...that he will not be forgotten.
Poor is the nation that has no heroes, shameful is the one that, having them...forgets."
03-15-2013, 09:43 AM #15
03-15-2013, 10:29 AM #16
Again, $1.5 million to research possible links to obesity is money well-spent. I would put a lot more credence in the studies concerning obesity ratios than I would the personal observations of our esteemed members here. If the solutions to all our problems were obvious, we wouldn't have problems. That's how scientific research works. You explore new ideas.
It's extremely close-minded to assume this is money wasted. I am quite confident that the people getting the money are serious about their research.
03-15-2013, 10:58 AM #17
it is wasted, why would the government be biased towards other people and spend 1.5 million on lesbians? why not have it be on all women or all Americans? or if they are so concerned about gays why not repeal the marriage defense act?
That's how scientific research works
03-15-2013, 11:33 AM #18
It's $1.5million to find out why lesbians are fat. At most, that's doing something about lesbian obesity, not obesity.
Basically it's taking a phrase often used by high school students (fat d*ke) and making it science.
This is the scientific process. This is a waste of money and homosexuals and the obese should be offended.
03-15-2013, 12:06 PM #19
03-15-2013, 12:24 PM #20