Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47
  1. #11




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    I have known many gay women in my lifetime. I would have thought the ratio was closer to 50/50. That being said, I see nothing wrong with allocating money to any study that looks to solve the obesity problem in society.

  2. #12




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    55
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    so you think sexual preference is related to body fat?

    how about that money be spent on why women were fat?

  3. #13





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    I have known many gay women in my lifetime. I would have thought the ratio was closer to 50/50. That being said, I see nothing wrong with allocating money to any study that looks to solve the obesity problem in society.

    This is seeking to find out how to fix a problem that exists primarily in a stereotype perpetuated by idiots. I'm all for doing something about obesity, but this only helps whoever is taking this money.

  4. #14







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    54
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    Nobody take this the wrong way, but when I see things like this, it kind of makes me hate America.

    I don't take it the wrong way. I get your point. When I see stuff like this is pours more concrete on my belief that there is no need to raise taxes. Taypayer dollars being spent on ignorant crap like this is proof that our government spending is over the top.

  5. #15




    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,120
    SCF Rewards
    161
    Country
    See bbra9027's Items on eBay

    I don't take it the wrong way. I get your point. When I see stuff like this is pours more concrete on my belief that there is no need to raise taxes. Taypayer dollars being spent on ignorant crap like this is proof that our government spending is over the top.


    Agreed. Until we changed the mindset of politicians from both parties we will continue to have crap like this or studies to see how fast ketchup runs.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
    Hidden Content darkdemon202404

  6. #16




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    Again, $1.5 million to research possible links to obesity is money well-spent. I would put a lot more credence in the studies concerning obesity ratios than I would the personal observations of our esteemed members here. If the solutions to all our problems were obvious, we wouldn't have problems. That's how scientific research works. You explore new ideas.

    It's extremely close-minded to assume this is money wasted. I am quite confident that the people getting the money are serious about their research.

  7. #17




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    55
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    it is wasted, why would the government be biased towards other people and spend 1.5 million on lesbians? why not have it be on all women or all Americans? or if they are so concerned about gays why not repeal the marriage defense act?

    That's how scientific research works

    sure, when it is not corrupted

  8. #18





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    It's $1.5million to find out why lesbians are fat. At most, that's doing something about lesbian obesity, not obesity.

    Basically it's taking a phrase often used by high school students (fat d*ke) and making it science.

    This is the scientific process. This is a waste of money and homosexuals and the obese should be offended.

  9. #19




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    it is wasted, why would the government be biased towards other people and spend 1.5 million on lesbians? why not have it be on all women or all Americans? or if they are so concerned about gays why not repeal the marriage defense act?



    sure, when it is not corrupted

    I think you are confused. They are trying to solve the obesity problem for ALL people by trying to explore links between sexuality and obesity which is an under-researched area.

  10. #20





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    I think you are confused. They are trying to solve the obesity problem for ALL people by trying to explore links between sexuality and obesity which is an under-researched area.

    No they aren't. They've based the whole thing on a stereotype that may or may not exist. How does that help? How is it different from studying why gay males are fashion conscious.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on