Results 31 to 40 of 62
-
03-27-2013, 11:43 AM #31
Ignoring how ignorant you are with that HIV comment (and yes.. very very ignorant).... can you show me who's driving 200mph on the autobon? lol.. most cars can't reach that speed.. and those that can, usually aren't street legal. The one's that both can, and are street legal usually cost around $500,000 or more. So.. once again we are going red herring.
As for the nuke.. if you let one sit in you closet for 50 years.. you'd be dead from radiation poisoning.. go for it lol
-
-
03-27-2013, 11:47 AM #32
-
03-27-2013, 11:50 AM #33
please tell me a practical purpose of a gun that doesn't involve killing, or practicing to kill something? Defensively or offensively.. they have no other use. Unless you just stare at them? lol
-
-
03-27-2013, 11:51 AM #34
Then what the hell kind of issue is it Jay ?
If it wasnt a legal one we wouldnt be addressing the SCOTUS
and please skip the religious aspects because that is out the window....
-
03-27-2013, 11:52 AM #35
Some people collect them as other collect stamps, baseball cards, vehicles, et .
-
-
03-27-2013, 11:53 AM #36
when was the last time a stamp, card, or even a car was able to fire a bullet at 500mph with the intent of killing its target? People collect swords too.. does that mean they aren't meant for cutting? lol
-
03-27-2013, 11:54 AM #37
And I hope that i with support that with...
They are in the best interest of the Public Welfare....
-
-
03-27-2013, 12:02 PM #38
Hold on a second here. You claimed that public safety and disease were in no way legal issues and only social ones. HIV makes that argument crap on the road. The LAWS surrounding HIV are to prevent the spread of the DISEASE in the name of PUBLIC SAFETY.
So please, tell me again how public safety and disease do not come into law anywhere.
Way to move the posts, good buddy.
-
03-27-2013, 12:03 PM #39
First off, calling someone ignorant is unnecessary. I did not insult you or be unreasonable with you. If the only way you can debate is to be insulting then I suggest you duck out now.
Second, I was generalizing with 200 MPH to make a point. Good job of arguing semantics tho.
Third, nuclear warheads are encased in lead, so no being around them would not result in death, and again that is a sematic and is not the point. You have gone off subject and still not shown how there is a legal basis against them. You continue to argue social aspects.
-
03-27-2013, 12:04 PM #40
If they sit in a collection and don't get used, then yeah, they're for looking at, not for cutting.
What a stupid question.
-