Results 11 to 20 of 23
04-04-2013, 11:40 AM #11
So the highest court in the land, who's job it is to interpret the constitution and decide what's constitutional are fallible and should have their rulings challenged.
But politicians shouldn't create laws that go against the Constitution.
So who decides what's constitutional and what's not?
It seems to me you believe YOU and only YOU should be in charge of the constitution. That sounds like a dictatorship, which goes against your constitution.
Better call SCOTUS and schedule your case to run the country as you see fit. After all, hey might have got that wrong.
04-04-2013, 11:52 AM #12
04-04-2013, 12:04 PM #13
04-04-2013, 12:44 PM #14
Keep reaching wick the draft will be here in a couple of weeks. It is not politicians job to sidestep the constitution. The SCOTUS is charged with explaining the constitutionality of laws however there is precedent for a later version of the supreme court to overturn a previous ruling eg Plessy vs Furguson.
04-04-2013, 01:48 PM #15
Whatever you say man. This isn't so much a sidestep as a soft secession. They're governing their own area. Frankly, I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner and anyone who champions state's rights should be cheering these Republicans on.
That, not religion, is the real crux of this issue.
04-04-2013, 01:52 PM #16
04-04-2013, 02:13 PM #17
04-04-2013, 02:25 PM #18
Click banner for tradelist
Dan LeFevour PC 192/283
04-04-2013, 03:17 PM #19
04-04-2013, 03:18 PM #20