Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11


    Wickabee's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,379
    Country
    Card Cash
    250.00
    Savings
    0.00
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)

    View my Inventory New
    View my store Beta
    So the highest court in the land, who's job it is to interpret the constitution and decide what's constitutional are fallible and should have their rulings challenged.

    But politicians shouldn't create laws that go against the Constitution.

    So who decides what's constitutional and what's not?

    It seems to me you believe YOU and only YOU should be in charge of the constitution. That sounds like a dictatorship, which goes against your constitution.

    Better call SCOTUS and schedule your case to run the country as you see fit. After all, hey might have got that wrong.
    Patiently waiting for someone to bring back sax solos and keytars non ironically.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Wickabee View Post
    So the highest court in the land, who's job it is to interpret the constitution and decide what's constitutional are fallible and should have their rulings challenged.

    But politicians shouldn't create laws that go against the Constitution.

    So who decides what's constitutional and what's not?

    It seems to me you believe YOU and only YOU should be in charge of the constitution. That sounds like a dictatorship, which goes against your constitution.

    Better call SCOTUS and schedule your case to run the country as you see fit. After all, hey might have got that wrong.
    So if the surpreme court makes a ruling that is eventually determined to run afoul of the constitution it should just stand forever because the ruled on it? Segregationists/republicans/conservatives are going to love you.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

  3. #13


    Wickabee's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,379
    Country
    Card Cash
    250.00
    Savings
    0.00
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)

    View my Inventory New
    View my store Beta
    Quote Originally Posted by mrveggieman View Post
    So if the surpreme court makes a ruling that is eventually determined to run afoul of the constitution it should just stand forever because the ruled on it? Segregationists/republicans/conservatives are going to love you.
    As is anyone else who tries to touch the constitution. Like these fine folks from NC.

    Glad to see you're on their side. Just wondering why you're arguing against yourself.
    Patiently waiting for someone to bring back sax solos and keytars non ironically.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Wickabee View Post
    As is anyone else who tries to touch the constitution. Like these fine folks from NC.

    Glad to see you're on their side. Just wondering why you're arguing against yourself.

    Keep reaching wick the draft will be here in a couple of weeks. It is not politicians job to sidestep the constitution. The SCOTUS is charged with explaining the constitutionality of laws however there is precedent for a later version of the supreme court to overturn a previous ruling eg Plessy vs Furguson.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

  5. #15


    Wickabee's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,379
    Country
    Card Cash
    250.00
    Savings
    0.00
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)

    View my Inventory New
    View my store Beta
    Whatever you say man. This isn't so much a sidestep as a soft secession. They're governing their own area. Frankly, I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner and anyone who champions state's rights should be cheering these Republicans on.
    That, not religion, is the real crux of this issue.
    Patiently waiting for someone to bring back sax solos and keytars non ironically.

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Wickabee View Post
    Whatever you say man. This isn't so much a sidestep as a soft secession. They're governing their own area. Frankly, I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner and anyone who champions state's rights should be cheering these Republicans on.
    That, not religion, is the real crux of this issue.
    He is violating his oath he made to the constitution and the people he was sworn to serve. If these republicans have that much of a problem with our constitution they need to resign immediately.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

  7. #17


    Wickabee's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,379
    Country
    Card Cash
    250.00
    Savings
    0.00
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)

    View my Inventory New
    View my store Beta
    Quote Originally Posted by mrveggieman View Post
    He is violating his oath he made to the constitution and the people he was sworn to serve. If these republicans have that much of a problem with our constitution they need to resign immediately.
    So what you're saying is, once any decision has been made regarding the constitution should not be questioned or challenged.

    You're kind of going back and forth. There's two pieces of cake veg, do your stuff!
    Patiently waiting for someone to bring back sax solos and keytars non ironically.

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by mrveggieman View Post
    Any politician who wants to disregard the 1st, 2nd amendment or any of our other constitutional rights to futher his/her own agenda needs to be arrested for treason.
    Sounds like Obama wants to disregard the 2nd amendment........
    Click banner for tradelist
    Hidden Content
    Dan LeFevour PC 192/283

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Wickabee View Post
    So what you're saying is, once any decision has been made regarding the constitution should not be questioned or challenged.

    You're kind of going back and forth. There's two pieces of cake veg, do your stuff!
    You are just like the republicans/christians/conservatives picking and chosing what they want to hear. I said that the supreme court is the final say so in legal matters but if they do make the wrong decision as in plessy vs furguson it can always be reversed by the court at a later date. Politicians have no authority to go around the supreme court. It's not a real difficult concept to grasp.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

  10. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by gladdyontherise View Post
    Sounds like Obama wants to disregard the 2nd amendment........

    When you have something to provide besides what you hear on faux news or theblaze I would love to hear it.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content

    Hidden Content

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •