05-08-2013, 04:02 PM #91
05-08-2013, 04:32 PM #92
alex, its biological function is not pleasure, it is to procreate, so no, two people of the same gender cannot procreate, thus use their reproduction organs for reproducing.
05-08-2013, 04:58 PM #93
Because according to medical science, there has NEVER, EVER been any evidence, not a single ounce of a soul inhabiting a human body.
Furthermore, what exactly is this "soul", can it talk, is it exactly like us except without a body? Is it a ghost?
Please enlighten me, I'd love to know what a "soul" is."The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness..."
05-08-2013, 05:02 PM #94
See, that doesn't make sense for various reasons.
First of all, the main function it has is to dispel urine from the body.....and after that I would indeed say that the next function would be for pleasure.
A penis doesn't have any reproductive capabilities, you're talking about semen.
And I'm not going to get any more graphic, but a human's sexual desires have never been to procreate, it's to experience orgasm."The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness..."
05-08-2013, 05:32 PM #95
we were talking reproductive organs, hence the name, reproduction and the last I checked sexuality does not change how one urinates.
alex, I would vote yes for gay marriage, I am just saying it is not a natural, biological, or evolutionary trait for our species to not reproduce, if this was so, none of us would be here. I agree evolution hasn't ended, but if it has in store for us to lose the desire to procreate, our species will end.
heck, maybe it is natures way of thinning us out, or some may say Gods way, or perhaps aliens???
my argument is, is does not make sense for a species to be genetically coded to not reproduce, thus I say homosexuals may not be born gay (ok I said they wouldn't be) because of the biological nature of our species. but i could perhaps see that our genetics could make us bisexual, just to try and reproduce with anyone we can.
I am unsure why this is bad to say or offends anyone
05-08-2013, 06:03 PM #96
2. Homosexuality has nothing to do with reproductive capabilities.
3. Evolution is about constant change in accordance to natural selection and mutations among other factors, and like the video I posted there is no real conflict between homosexuality and evolution.....because there is no "gay gene", humans are born with a variety of preferences which they can't control, I will say we haven't figured it out yet, but one day we might.
4. I don't know what evolution has in store for humanity either, but we will not have to worry about that, whatever happens is out of our control.
By your own definition these people are unnatural and abnormal....since they are NOT capable of reproduction regardless of their preferences.
Again, the evidence is not on your side, there is no reason for people to lie about why they are attracted to the same gender.
Even back in history where gays were killed and tortured for being gay.....gays still existed!
You really think someone would risk being tortured and killed if they could really control their sexuality?
Here's another good video to watch:
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness..."
05-08-2013, 06:15 PM #97
Hidden Content <- my wants
most anything I have more than 1 of in my SCF inventory is FT...PM me for info
Always looking to add to these team collections: Toronto Maple Leafs; Pittsburgh Steelers; Cincinnati Reds; Notre Dame; Team Sweden Hockey
05-08-2013, 06:19 PM #98
05-08-2013, 09:41 PM #99
wickabee, sure that it was most use it for most of the time, but we are still talking two different things.
alex, yes they would be "not normal" doesn't mean they are bad or immoral. someone born with two thumbs in "not normal", someone with downsymdrome is "not normal" but that is not putting anyone down.
I still disagree and wait for some real finds to point me in a different direction, then you can say you are right, and we can explain people who are not born homosexual but still are, as making a choice.
so I pose a new question.
if there is a gay gene would this cause people to raise their kids differently, if they knew they were born gay?
05-09-2013, 06:35 AM #100
Instead of running away please feel free to counter offer my offers.A deal can always be made