Results 21 to 29 of 29
05-12-2013, 09:13 PM #21
05-12-2013, 09:56 PM #22
05-12-2013, 10:02 PM #23
I still need Yzerman!!
If you ever run across another one........
05-12-2013, 10:14 PM #24
Searching for: Jagr, Palffy, Stumpel, and Boyd
Here is my Hidden Content My Photobucket is out of date. I am now fully uploaded to the SCF Inventory Manager!
Now collecting Upper Deck CFL Saskatchewan Roughriders Cards!!
05-12-2013, 10:28 PM #25
05-12-2013, 10:37 PM #26
Just a quick follow-up to my original post. I'm wondering if you guys agree with the rating of this card:
To me, the card has been altered, as all of 94/95 Finest came with the Protective layer. As a collectible, I'd remove it. But as for grading, seems like it should be N/A.
05-12-2013, 11:04 PM #27
Personally, IMO the plastic coating on top of the card isn't part of the card to begin with, the card is the card and kudos to that guy for ripping it off and letting the card shine on through!
It's just like smashing open a ITG slab or Heaven Forbid, slicing through the "seal" on an ITG top-loader, after you're done your left with.........the card.
I, however, am not in this for the money whatsoever, and I do things to my cards that would make some of you scream and faint and punch me in the face, in whatever order you wanna go with....
05-14-2013, 10:52 AM #28
05-14-2013, 12:42 PM #29
It's a tough question.
If you ever think you might resell the card, keep the film on (or the Slab, the Seal, whatever). If it's something you don't care about the resale value of.... let it shine! Will look better in your own collection. I kept the film on my Ranford stuff from that era, for a long, long time. Pulled them off last year - and the difference on some of those refactors / mirrors is incredible.
I think though, for resale, you're better off leaving them on. It lets the next collector chose how they want it.