View Poll Results: Which LA team's slow start has been more shocking so far?
- 9. This poll is closed
Results 1 to 7 of 7
05-11-2013, 09:24 PM #1
Which LA team's slow start has been more shocking so far?
Which LA team's slow start has been more shocking so far? The Dodgers or Angels?Trade Bucket: Hidden Content
05-11-2013, 09:32 PM #2
05-11-2013, 09:41 PM #3
Angels without a doubt. On paper, arguably the best lineup in MLB.
05-12-2013, 04:45 AM #4
The Dodgers, but it's because they've had so many injuries. The Angels don't surprise me in the least. I didn't think they'd make the playoffs because their pitching is horrible, and their lineup was getting pretty overrated. Hamilton can't keep the bat on his shoulder, and Pujols showed last year some signs of a decline (and this year the decline looks to be showing even more often). Trout is great, but is there anyone else? Mark Trumbo? No thanks.
05-12-2013, 08:22 AM #5
05-13-2013, 09:08 AM #6
Angels. They have a team that can perform as a World Series team. But like always, having a lot of stars on your team, does not pays off most of the time.
05-13-2013, 10:35 AM #7
It's just a poorly assembled team by the owner, who is going to scapegoat the manager and GM.