Results 21 to 30 of 52
-
10-24-2014, 01:23 PM #21
Waiting for a liberal blog to post a retort so they can copy and paste.
-
-
10-24-2014, 02:36 PM #22
Where are the Cop Haters?
-
10-24-2014, 02:56 PM #23
its all just a distraction from what the obola admin is doing.
the guy was a thug, thugs get killed every day by other thugs. it should not have been news.
-
-
10-24-2014, 03:54 PM #24
Funny thing is there have been libs in here posting in other threads and they have simply avoided this thread. Their silence is both golden and revealing. Got enough mouth to run in and trashtalk when there is chance to label someone a racist, but not enough balls to come in when it is time to admit they were wrong. Typical.
-
10-24-2014, 04:48 PM #25
liberal
[lib-er-uh l, lib-ruh l] Spell Syllables
adjective1.favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2.(often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political partyadvocating measures of progressive political reform.
3.of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially thefreedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individualrights and liberties.
4.favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedompossible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmentalprotection of civil liberties.
5.favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect tomatters of personal belief or expression:a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6.of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather thanaristocracies and monarchies.
7.free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant:a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
Expand
noun14.a person of liberal principles or views, especially in politics or religion.
15.(often initial capital letter) a member of a liberal party in politics,especially of the Liberal party in Great Britain.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal
just because the leftist have highjacked the word dosnt mean you have to too
same goes for conservative and far religious right
-
-
10-24-2014, 04:55 PM #26
And there won't be any posts because this goes against many arguements. I guess some folks cannot admit they are wrong they are just like the media jumping the gun. AGAIN who thinks Rev AL and Uncle Jessie will come out and aplogize how they slandered this officer IF AND WHEN ALL THE TRUTH COMES OUT. Hmm Al must have forgot Tawana Brawley still waiting for that apology.
-
10-24-2014, 08:30 PM #27
The organization of the protests was almost frightening. Is there a protest/riot squad just waiting to jump into action? Eric Holder went charging into Ferguson and returned quietly out the back door when the video surfaced.
I have no idea if the cop is truly clean in this situation, but there is a mountain of evidence that says that we should listen to all of the facts before making a final judgement.
What happens if the Grand Jury does not recommend the case to go to trial?
-
-
10-25-2014, 09:32 AM #28
Many good points first one which is always overlooked WAIT TIL ALL THE FACTS COME OUT. But it is such a hot topic a white cop shoot unarmed black man that the media and some of society cannot wait to hang a crooked white man let alone a cop. And f this case does not go to trial it will be A. because the white man is racist or B well we will just wait for the next white cop to mess up. And believe me there will be some cases where cops will do something unjust and they should be brought to justice. But these clowns will not ask for justice for this cop IF AND I SAY IF he is found innocent. Funny how that works
-
10-28-2014, 04:32 AM #29
AHH yes the sounds of silence. Sad that the haters who jumped on the band wagon cannot man up and say "wow maybe I was wrong on this one".
-
10-29-2014, 09:41 AM #30
Let's tap the brakes on this until there's an official report released. All we have so far are leaks and an incredibly irresponsible article.
The forensic pathologist quoted says she was misquoted several times-- one of her attributed claims being outright fabricated (saying the autopsy didn't support eye-witness accounts) and another being only halfway covered (she was asked whether the autopsy matches Wilson's claims; however she was never asked if it matches others' claims)-- in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch articles. It's irresponsible reporting at its finest-- funny how some love to claim bias and irresponsibility when it supports one side but bury their head in the sand when it supports their side.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/1...h-Says-It-Does
It's hilarious to watch right-wingers pick and choose which pieces of mainstream media reporting are trustworthy and which ones aren't. You claim board liberals are silent. I see board conservatives willfully ignoring other possibilities. Face it: you both made up your minds as soon as it happened and nothing would convince you otherwise. Wilson could come out and admit he shot him intentionally and you righties would claim that Brown still had it coming. Brown's corpse could pop up out of the ground and say "Yep, I attacked him" and the lefties would insist it was because he was being oppressed for so long.
If it's police brutality, then Wilson deserves prison time. If it's the case of Brown being an idiot and trying to attack a cop, he got what he deserved. The fact is you can't trust the reporting until something official is released. Based on Ferguson's history, I wouldn't put it past Wilson to have killed Brown intentionally, but at the same time let's get all the facts here. You don't have them. Nor do I. Nor does the media.Last edited by *censored*; 10-29-2014 at 09:44 AM.
-