Welcome to Sports Card Forum

The Ultimate for Everything Sports and Non-Sports Cards

  •  » Are you interested in Sports and Non-Sports Cards
  •  » Looking for a tool to track your collections?
  •  » Need addresses to request for Autographs?
  •  » Want to know about Shows coming to your area?

...then you have come to the right place!

Sports Card Forum can do all of this and much more!!!

Register an account for FREE right now!

Or If you are already a Member, Please log in at the Top/Right of this page!

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
  1. #1







    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    43,661
    SCF Rewards
    18,076
    Country

    Post Obama sending another 1500 troops to Iraq for non combat roles

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...oops-Iraq.html

    President Barack Obama told Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel on Friday that the Pentagon can send as many as 1,500 additional ground troops to Iraq as part of the U.S. mission to fight ISIS.

    That deployment would approximately double the American military personnel in place there. The Defense Department had until Friday a mandate to send no more than 1,600 troops, and had put 1,400 in the field already.

    The White House also asked Congress for $5.6 billion in new war funding, all while insisting that the U.S. military is not using ground forces in a combat role. .

    Instead, the administration continued to stress on Friday that American personnel would train, advise and assist Iraqi military and Kurdish forces fighting the ISIS terror army.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Baseball Trade Page: Hidden Content
    4 Sport Trade Bucket: Hidden Content

  2. Check out Steel City Collectibles
  3. #2




    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    816
    SCF Rewards
    100
    Country

    Why would you send more American Soldiers in a non-combat role? What in the world does this prove? That they will be sitting ducks?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #3







    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    43,661
    SCF Rewards
    18,076
    Country

    Why would you send more American Soldiers in a non-combat role? What in the world does this prove? That they will be sitting ducks?
    I don't really get it either. They have trained Iraq troops for YEARS. What more could these 1500 people teach them in a short amount of time? So I'm going to chalk this move up to Obama and the Democrats trying to look busy after getting beat bad in the election a few days ago. Just make news to try and squash the bad news. Not really the best thing to put the lives of 1500 in danger to do so but it isn't like Obama has really cared for the troops that much to begin with.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  5. #4




    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,079
    SCF Rewards
    157
    Country

    I don't really get it either. They have trained Iraq troops for YEARS. What more could these 1500 people teach them in a short amount of time? So I'm going to chalk this move up to Obama and the Democrats trying to look busy after getting beat bad in the election a few days ago. Just make news to try and squash the bad news. Not really the best thing to put the lives of 1500 in danger to do so but it isn't like Obama has really cared for the troops that much to begin with.
    Just like the new AG, just another political maneuver that was postponed until after the election.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #5








    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    25,482
    SCF Rewards
    10,475
    Country
    Miami Dolphins New York Mets Miami Heat
    See FLIHGH's Items on eBay

    Why would you send more American Soldiers in a non-combat role? What in the world does this prove? That they will be sitting ducks?
    If they sent them to be in a combat role, America would be up in arms and the approval ratings would go down even further. The 1500 can at least try and slow the rate that ISIS is demolishing the Middle East.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Andrew Bailey: 208/255 not including 1/1's (81.6%); 226/458 cards including 1/1's(49.3%)

  7. #6




    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    816
    SCF Rewards
    100
    Country

    If they sent them to be in a combat role, America would be up in arms and the approval ratings would go down even further. The 1500 can at least try and slow the rate that ISIS is demolishing the Middle East.
    This makes no sense. How can troops sent in a non-combat role help to slow ISIS?

    I don't know the correct role, if any, for these troops in Iraq. I do know that sending them over as non-combat troops has more to do with recovery of poll numbers than anything else.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #7








    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    25,482
    SCF Rewards
    10,475
    Country
    Miami Dolphins New York Mets Miami Heat
    See FLIHGH's Items on eBay

    This makes no sense. How can troops sent in a non-combat role help to slow ISIS?

    I don't know the correct role, if any, for these troops in Iraq. I do know that sending them over as non-combat troops has more to do with recovery of poll numbers than anything else.
    Did you not read the article? Or, even the first post?

    American personnel would train, advise and assist Iraqi military and Kurdish forces fighting the ISIS terror army.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #8




    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    816
    SCF Rewards
    100
    Country

    Did you not read the article? Or, even the first post?
    I read the article. Maybe I should rephrase my question to how can this strategy do anything but get our soldiers killed versus making any real progress against ISIS? Wouldn't it be easier to send ISIS pamphlets about the horror of war? I see this as a really bad idea for our troops.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  10. #9








    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    25,482
    SCF Rewards
    10,475
    Country
    Miami Dolphins New York Mets Miami Heat
    See FLIHGH's Items on eBay

    I read the article. Maybe I should rephrase my question to how can this strategy do anything but get our soldiers killed versus making any real progress against ISIS? Wouldn't it be easier to send ISIS pamphlets about the horror of war? I see this as a really bad idea for our troops.
    Well, my opinion is that we will be helping militaries that are pretty hapless on their own...so, if we can slow ISIS now, with the possibility of a few fatalities, it may save us from ISIS getting bigger and better and carrying out a major terrorist attack on us later. My .02.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  11. #10




    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    816
    SCF Rewards
    100
    Country

    Well, my opinion is that we will be helping militaries that are pretty hapless on their own...so, if we can slow ISIS now, with the possibility of a few fatalities, it may save us from ISIS getting bigger and better and carrying out a major terrorist attack on us later. My .02.
    I really hope that it can work as you describe. My total disdain for Obama is clouding my view of anything he does or says these days.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on