View Poll Results:
- Voters
- 0. This poll is closed
-
0 0%
Results 21 to 30 of 137
-
10-06-2009, 11:00 PM #21
Really dude?
Where is the option where one does not hate military men or women, they just think that war most of the time can be avoided and often changes someone for the worse?
-
-
10-06-2009, 11:03 PM #22
silvia is a military man, he doesn't believe that's an option
-
10-06-2009, 11:19 PM #23
Me, I'm that one.
-
-
10-07-2009, 12:38 AM #24
I don't think highly enough of humanity to presume war can be avoided.
-
10-07-2009, 01:50 AM #25
Your participation in this was completely voluntary. I do appreciate your response. As you'll notice, your view is in the huge minority.
It's not just a soldier, either. Publicly paid abortions are about last on my list of things that should come to reality. If you were to fall and break your leg tomorrow, and we have a public healthcare policy, I would be glad to pay for your expense. However, to pay for the conscious mistake of another is quite different.
I'm glad you think so highly of the values of women who get abortions. Sure, a lot are great people who truly just slipped up. That's fine. But that doesn't warrant the populous of this country to pay. Furthermore, I'm just guessing that a lot of these women acted very foolishly to end up where they are. I'm not okay with paying for drunk women's abortion, and I'm sure there are plenty of abortions that stem from just that.
So I'm conservative? Is it conservative to support abortions or gay marriage or the legalization of marijuana? Weird. Just try and guess who I voted for last November, champ.
-
-
10-07-2009, 01:31 PM #26
I have to agree, if a women wants to make decision to not bring a life into the world they can not/ or do not want to care for than that's being responsible-even though its after an intial mistake.
-
10-07-2009, 01:40 PM #27
Is there a reason why you don't mention the guy's responsibility here? You just can't blame a women since it takes two.
IMO its foolish not to use protection or B/C, but I'd rather have the mistake taken care of than a child who burdens the system or has a terrible home life.
-
-
10-07-2009, 02:40 PM #28
There is a huge difference in this cases.
He serve our country and he deserves it.
The girl had sex and does not want the baby. Her family can pay for the abortion. If not she needs to have the baby and give it for adoption.
There is no need for politicians to be evaluating and comparing this totally opposite situations.
-
10-07-2009, 02:53 PM #29
yeah. the two things just dont add up. There is a big difference between losing a limb and getting an abortion. One person is out a few hundred bucks and a half a day of time. The other has to endure multiple surgeries and months or years of rehab to learn to walk again. You are also forgetting something else. I think it was Yanks who said the soldier was stupid for enlisting/signing the military contract. You forget that the decision is based on the knowledge that they will get all of their medical help for free. I dont see too many people enlisting otherwise. thats why the arguments are different.
-
10-07-2009, 03:13 PM #30
Are you serious? Should we also deny football players coverage because they are willingly playing a sport that is obviously dangerous? I'm not going to go into how ridiculous it is to put the girl's problems on her family's tab, but I would have a much bigger problem seeing another baby put up for adoption. It's bad enough how many kids go up for adoption as it is, not to mention the ones who's parents say they don't want a kid after a couple years of doing a ****ty job of raising them. I don't know if people realize the psychological problems that can arise and the cost these "unwanted" kids end up being on our system in the long run.
-













