ABC news has got to be the most unreliable source of news.

[INTIMADATOR2007]

http://nation.foxnews.com/abc-news/2...night-shooting

O.k the body's of this terrible massacre are still warm and ABC news is already blaming the tea-party . I shouldn't be shocked seeing were it's coming from but this is beyond dishonest jouralism , It's down right shameful.They can't even use the shooters name , The shooter name is James Holmes and they dig up something from a guy named Jim Holmes . Anything to fill an agenda , I guess.

[JustAlex]

Surely you must see the unbelievable irony of claiming ABC to be unreliable while posting a Fox News link....

It's like having the Yankees complain when other teams spend large amounts of money...

[habsheaven]

Totally uncalled for.

[mrveggieman]

It was a simple mistake that they already apologized to the man that they wrongfully accused. What more do you want?

[habsheaven]

*I can't believe I am saying this.* But I am with INTIMIDATOR on this one. It wasn't a simple mistake. It was totally unprofessional conduct to state it on air without properly vetting it first. And I think a personal agenda may have clouded their judgement.

It was a simple mistake that they already apologized to the man that they wrongfully accused. What more do you want?

[INTIMADATOR2007]

Surely you must see the unbelievable irony of claiming ABC to be unreliable while posting a Fox News link....

It's like having the Yankees complain when other teams spend large amounts of money...

Had to go there to find the truth ..lol

[ensbergcollector]

It was a simple mistake that they already apologized to the man that they wrongfully accused. What more do you want?

you can't have it both ways. everything done by fox news you call a purposeful misrepresentation and manipulative reporting. You can't then turn around and give abc the "simple mistake" answer. It was shoddy journalism. And i'm sorry, going to air with something like this and then apologizing is like printing a front page story and then retracting it two days later on page 28c. doesn't make it all better

[INTIMADATOR2007]

It was a simple mistake that they already apologized to the man that they wrongfully accused. What more do you want?

A simple mistake from there "Lead investigative reporter" . Cmon' you smarter than that .The man went to the back did a quick Google,Facebook, Twitter search and reported the first thing that come up with anything to do with the republicans, tea-party or conservatives and probably NRA members in a attempt to blame the "right wing nut jobs"

[INTIMADATOR2007]

you can't have it both ways. everything done by fox news you call a purposeful misrepresentation and manipulative reporting. You can't then turn around and give abc the "simple mistake" answer. It was shoddy journalism. And i'm sorry, going to air with something like this and then apologizing is like printing a front page story and then retracting it two days later on page 28c. doesn't make it all better

They did what they sat out to do , just throw the word tea-party out there and hope it sticks .

[INTIMADATOR2007]

*I can't believe I am saying this.* But I am with INTIMIDATOR on this one. It wasn't a simple mistake. It was totally unprofessional conduct to state it on air without properly vetting it first. And I think a personal agenda may have clouded their judgement.

I knew you had it in ya'...