Results 21 to 30 of 43
-
05-31-2012, 05:01 PM #21
Unfortunately, the Bruins seem to think this gives them the right to run around like idiots, headhunting for the other team's stars.
As to the last sentence, that's funny coming from someone talking about Boston. Didn't everyone put the Cup win solely at Thomas's feet last year?
-
-
05-31-2012, 05:15 PM #22
I respect your opinion like all others on the boards when it comes to hockey as a sport.
But the Bruins did not have more scoring ability than the Canucks.
They ended up putting more goals in the net for that playoff series, but it wasn't because they had more scoring depth.
The Canucks had more fire power. They just failed to capitalize on their chances. If the Canucks actually was on full flight scoring, the Bruins won't be able to catch up.
What hockey are you watching? The Bruins having the best 5 on 5 hockey in the league and incredible talent. They have a few players that are actually talented in Seguin etc. The use of talent is completely off. Do they play good hockey, yeah for sure. But are those skillful players, talented, or stars? No. They are good at what they do which is your "Bruins hockey." Hit, check, dig, and squeeze the puck out. Score on a rebound or something like that. Seguin to me is the only one that can flat out score... that is talent.
Bruins won because they ended up rattling the Canucks because with their running around, hitting, and intimidation. As far as I know, Canucks lost composure after the game 2. If they played their game, they would have won.
Speaking of outclass, you really thought they outclassed the Canucks? Taking penalties doesn't make them classless or anyone classless. I wonder what Bruins were doing to make the Canucks take those penalties. The Canucks outclassed the Bruins the entire 10-11 season.
Blame it on "all" the Canucks diving you want, but take a look at every team. They all do the same **** all the time. It's easy to point the figure at the Canucks when they have the spotlight on them since the first game of the 10-11 season.Last edited by Yipper; 05-31-2012 at 05:24 PM.
-
05-31-2012, 06:34 PM #23
So now the Bruins run around like idiots? Since when? They won a Stanley Cup and humiliated the Canucks.
Perhaps the Canucks need to start running around like idiots, because what they are doing now ain't working.
I laugh at Canuck fans that don't think the Bruin's Cup win is legitimate.
Babies, one and all.
-
-
05-31-2012, 09:23 PM #24
Every time I see this I get sick and tired of the same old "Canucks fans are babies." Most of us know the Bruins outplayed the Canucks by finding away to get away with crossing the line enough to provoke the other team to distract them. They scored on almost every turnover it seemed like. The main reason why the Canucks lost is because they lost 2 top 6 defencemen in the finals 2-3 games in, one being a top 2 shutdown defender. You can't replace that. You can't have that much depth to come in and replace two top 6 defencemen and expect to win. In fact, for the Canucks to make it to game 7 with 4 dman who played regularly for their team during the season and playoffs is a feat in itself when you are up against a fairly physical team in the Bruins.
As far as the Luongo talks go, I'd say there is about an 85% chance he gets traded to the Leafs for as follows:
To Toronto:
Roberto Luongo
Marc-Andre Gragnani
To Vancouver:
Mike Komisarek
A Prospect/Draft Pick
Tyler Bozak or Colby Armstrong
Why it works: Leafs need defence and a goalie, also getting rid of Bozak or Armstrong opens a spot for up and coming forward prospects. Canucks get a gritty defenceman in Komisarek and take a bit of a cap hit in return for Luongo with his contract, as well as an NHL forward and a future piece.
-
05-31-2012, 09:32 PM #25
and they both like to riot too
-
-
05-31-2012, 09:49 PM #26
I've been seeing this ever since the first game I saw Schneider play... from then on have loved him. He is 100% positionally sound, Luongo is like my nickname (coincidentally got it from goaltending lol (he stole my style ;)))
-
05-31-2012, 10:47 PM #27
I listen to the sports radio station all day and haven't heard such a thing and the Leaf's don't need another defenceman so whatever your source is, sounds highly inaccurate. Hope it isn't Pierre Maguire lol.
-
-
05-31-2012, 10:55 PM #28
You 'Nucks fans need to get some perspective. The way I see it Scheider hasn't proven a damn thing and has yet to be named a starter due to an injury or and hasn't been given the chance to run the course as Vancouver's #1 goalie. Until he gets enough games to be called a starter he is a back up.
Just like with Reimer a couple of years ago. He took the reigns and did great, but all that hype and good play quickly vanished this year. Who's to say Schneider won't have the same thing happen to him this year? All these young goalies get too much hype. Jonathan Bernier in L.A is the same way. Come on people he has less than 20 games under his belt!
-
05-31-2012, 11:51 PM #29
Unfortunately for all goalies, poop rolls downhill. If you are the last line of defense, you are going to get the most blame, whether it is justified or not. Wish you luck Lu.
-
05-31-2012, 11:55 PM #30
Less than 20 games? You really need to do some research before responding.
-















