Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1

  2. #2
    Good. I have no problem with Chiefs of Braves, but Redskins? Why not the New York Darkies? As for Indians, I don't know if Native Americans or people from India should be more offended about that one.

  3. #3
    Indians are in fact from India, and nowhere else. Similar to the French. The French are from France, not Quebec or Louisiana.

  4. #4
    Thanks for summing it up...

  5. #5
    The should have got rid of the name along with their idiot owner a long time ago.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

  6. #6
    I will say, they are a close second to the Chicago Blackhawks in the best logo category.

  7. #7
    I mean really, Redskins is as offensive as "Wagon Burner" or "Gut-Eater" The name is in very bad taste.

  8. #8
    I agree. I'm baffled as to how this name has been around so long. I have no issue with using positive native american names like the braves and the seminoles, but a name like the redskins and a logo like the indians are rather offensive.

    I actually like the suggested name in the article of redtails. I don't even think they'd need to change the logo.
    Check out my NEW FaceBook Fan page of my abstract painting and graphic design work!!!
    Hidden Content

  9. #9
    Seminoles are an indigenous, proud Tribe. Braves is word glamourized by the Hollywood Movie Industry.

  10. #10
    Why not change their name to the Washington Rednecks in honor of the republican party?
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts