Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,032
    SCF Rewards
    1,709
    Country

    Redemptions: The Good, The Bad, The Expired - Contest Entry

    Redemptions: The Good, The Bad, The Expired

    Pulling a redemption can be a time to celebrate, especially when you look at the checklist and realize that your redemption is for a shield, one of one autograph. At the same time, it can be a time of anger, rage and disappointment. Looking at your shield, one of one autograph from 2008 Exquisite and realizing that most companies will do nothing to help your expired code. I’ve had my own personal positive and negative experiences with redemptions. I’ve noticed most people on Sports Card Forum absolutely despise redemptions. I thought we should explore the reasons why we have so many redemptions in today’s hobby.

    Like many collectors who’ve dealt with redemptions, the one that sticks out in my mind is the negative experience. In 2005, my local card shop had some packs left of 2002 Upper Deck Authentics. I hadn’t ever tried opening these before, but I liked the design because it was similar to the 1989 Upper Deck (Ken Griffey Jr. RC pictured below) baseball set.

    A few packs in, I was ecstatic that I had pulled a Troy Aikman autograph redemption. After looking it over, I realized that it was 6 months past its expiration date. Thinking that a simple phone call to customer service would help, I called the next day. I realize that their job is to follow the rules and read the policy to make sure it’s clear, but you’d think they’d at least act like they felt bad. Sure the customer service representative might not know much about sports cards or sports players, but they have to realize that missing out on a card is tough for collectors. After a couple minutes on the phone with them, I knew that the redemption was nothing more than another decoy. My positive experiences have far outweighed my negative ones. From dealing with replacements to the Russell Wilson Contenders redemptions, companies can quick and professional. I’ve always treaded lightly with older products going forward because of this.

    A lot of collectors will look at the companies to blame for having an abundance of redemptions. I think an equal part of the blame should be placed on the collectors/consumers. The demand for more new product continues to be strong, even with redemptions popping up everywhere. Demand is ultimately what drives more brands being created and released. Even with the uncertainty of redemptions being fulfilled, they still do very well on the secondary markets. That reason alone shows me that redemptions won’t go away in favor of reducing the amount of product on a yearly basis. So far this year, Geno Smith has 288 different autographed cards and no redemptions (not counting Exquisite). Jordan Poyer has only 56 different autographed cards and has several redemptions. Sure you see people every now and again threatening to boycott a brand because of redemptions. Will this work to affect how companies use redemptions? I can’t see it working. Am I saying that I love redemptions? Of course not, I don’t like the idea of waiting for a card that is owed to me. I know that I have to accept them though to keep the hobby going and the new brands hitting shelves. I’d rather have the products come out on time, and have a few redemptions sprinkled in. Let’s face it, we all can’t afford the 10 card pack Flawless Basketball (MSRP: $2,035/dacardworld.com) and a chance to avoid redemptions.

    Is there a reason that you’d stop buying packs/boxes? I’ve asked myself that question multiple times over the last couple years. I’ve had periods of time where I haven’t purchased many packs/boxes, but I’ve purchased singles. If you think about it, purchasing singles is still supporting the breaking of boxes, cases and packs. Sure you didn’t directly open a pack, buy a box or bust a case. That card came from someone ripping it though. More than likely by you buying the card, you’re reloading the money train to head to the card station for another visit. Obviously buying singles takes the risk out of opening wax and that satisfies some. The rush and the fun you get from opening packs is what inspires others.
    This Ad will be removed when you a member of sportscardforum.com



    That little voice inside each of our heads still gives us the thought that we’ll pull that huge hit. I won’t lie, that’s what keeps me going back for another box. In conclusion, the bottom line for me is that I can’t blame the card companies because I’m encouraging them through buying. Redemptions are just a product of the beast. Sometimes it’s a love to hate them and sometimes it’s a hate to love them situation.


    Glimpse of my redemptions over the last 3 years, yet I'm still buying

  2. #2
    Writing Team






    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    28,717
    SCF Rewards
    7,960
    Country
    See spuds1961's Items on eBay

    Nice read and by the stacks it looks like Panini is a redemption heavy brand.

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,032
    SCF Rewards
    1,709
    Country

    Nice read and by the stacks it looks like Panini is a redemption heavy brand.

    Thanks Steve. Yes, they are by far winning.

  4. #4






    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    25,243
    SCF Rewards
    41,471
    Blog Entries
    35
    Country
    Montreal Canadiens Toronto Blue Jays New England Patriots
    Twitter: @Pheebs888 See Pheebs8882's Items on eBay

    Thanks for the submission. Published here: http://www.sportscardforum.com/artic...d-the-expired/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on