Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
06-26-2007, 07:18 PM #1
UD Artifacts
I didn't buy any today, but my brothers did. I have to say, I feel they are an absolute rip-off. My brother David ended up paying $22 for a Matt Spaeth RC and a Kenneth Darby RC. I realize "it happens" but for twenty bucks that's a little ridiculous.
-
-
06-26-2007, 09:16 PM #2

its junk. some of the Autos you can pull are a joke. no offense to those players or people who collect some of the "no-names". But it just doesnt make sense to make them a part of the set. UD had to know they would get some complaints about this, especially at that price point. Why not stuff those into the regular Upper Deck set?
-
06-26-2007, 09:36 PM #3
hey, artifacts is by far the worst product put out since 2005 bowmans best football, like next54 said the autos are just terrible, can't believe people are still opening this stuff.....
-
-
06-26-2007, 09:41 PM #4

Yeah the stuff isn't hitting that good.
-
06-26-2007, 09:59 PM #5

The base card design suxs. The regular autos sux and so do the regular GU cards. It's the numbered ones that start to look better. I won't buy any but will trade for a #'d Steelers or UVA guy card.
-
-
06-30-2007, 11:04 PM #6
I laugh at the "no names" autos...heck Brunell is in the set so I'm a happy camper!!!!!!
---
BTW WHAT is the difference between the regular auto and the parallel auto? On the UD website all the cards have the same identical card # and neither are serial numbered. SO how can I identify the difference between the 2?!?The most complete/comprehensive single player collection in the world with 95% of his Known cards & 400+ #1/1s.
-
06-30-2007, 11:05 PM #7
Originally Posted by 6boyds
How did he get a box of Artifacts for only $20?
-
-
07-01-2007, 07:58 AM #8
This stuff is so bad they are not even searching it!
-
07-01-2007, 11:46 AM #9
Originally Posted by elgato
lol..........
-
07-01-2007, 11:50 AM #10

Originally Posted by MrBigShot_23
there are blasters, but 2 hobby packs would run you about the same $$.
-











