Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
03-12-2003, 11:17 PM #1titan102390Guest
better offseason cards vs. skins
both teams have picked up at least 4 guys but who will have the better teams in the 03-04 season?
-
-
03-13-2003, 11:53 AM #2
The skins will have better year because they had more good players before they added more in free agency than the cards
-
04-19-2003, 04:50 PM #3
The Redskins made by far the best offseason moves.
-
-
04-19-2003, 04:58 PM #4
Cardinals haven't done much to add to their talent; Emmitt was brought in to bring in fan attendance.
Redskins should be much better under Spurry's 2nd year.
-
04-19-2003, 05:14 PM #5
The Cardinals lost Plummer and Boston. They aren't going anywhere.
-
-
04-19-2003, 07:43 PM #6
Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB
-
04-22-2003, 07:10 PM #7
Originally posted by podstock
Losing Boston wasn't good. I agree there. But as for Plummer - well, he had his shot, many times over, and it wasn't to be. Best that they let him go and start over with a new QB
I don't think that it was Plummer's fault. Its the team that sucked around him.
Now he gets his final chance to prove himself in Denver.Selling All My Cards Here------>Hidden Content
Baseball Autograph and Game Used Only Trade Page: pwaldo.webs.com/
//s123.photobucket.com/albums/o299/pwaldo/
-
