Results 111 to 120 of 180
-
04-18-2012, 01:37 PM #111
are you serious???
how about radioactive half life?
or even better, fossil evidence
-
-
04-18-2012, 02:27 PM #112
I'm not going to go into the fossil record as most know the arguments.
Have you ever studied radioactive dating? If you have you know it has been proved unreliable and is based on assumptions. Lava flows on the sides of Mt. Ngauruhoe that are known to be about 50 years old dated up to 3.5 million years old. Here is an article that puts it better then I could.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...ometric-dating
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...n4/assumptions
http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...v5/n1/patterns
I hope you take the time to read these.
-
04-18-2012, 02:40 PM #113
anyone knows that heat and/or fire will cause dating to be wrong.
so dating lava would be kind of silly?
no offense, but if that is your link for answers, you and i may only agree that jesus is the only way to god and heaven
-
-
04-18-2012, 03:11 PM #114
Oh my goodness, you haven't studied radiometric dating have you? The only rocks they can use are igneous and metamorphic, both of which are formed by heat or fire. How can you believe the bolded part and radiometric dating?
-
04-18-2012, 03:19 PM #115
Everyone know we lived at the same time as the dinosaurs. Remember the Flintstones? Hello!!!
-
-
04-18-2012, 03:25 PM #116
how is it not a theory?
-
04-18-2012, 03:26 PM #117
this is a joke right?
-
-
04-18-2012, 03:26 PM #118
Everyone knows that dinosaur fossils are fake.
-
04-18-2012, 03:29 PM #119
I'd love a brontosauras burger right about now!!!
-
04-18-2012, 03:34 PM #120
Prove it to me. Just acting like I'm stupid doesn't make your position right.Last edited by boba; 04-18-2012 at 03:37 PM.
-