Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
10-17-2014, 09:00 AM #1
Fox News reports US really did discover Iraqi WMD's in 2004... tons of them.
Gotta love Fox News... they reported 5-6 times yesterday that the US "secretly found as many as 5000 Chemical WMD's in Iraq from 2004-11".... they leave out the fact that these were actually weapons from the 1980's the United States helped produce and the discovery was covered up by the Bush Administration because it was Donald Rumsfeld who sold the technology to Sadam Hussein lol.
Oh... and they had absolutely nothing to do with the propaganda leading up to the Iraq war in 2003... another small footnote Fox left out.
Educate yourself, don't listen to biased media.
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/fox-an...wmd-cover-iraq
-
-
10-17-2014, 09:08 AM #2
Educate yourself, don't listen to biased media.
so don't listen to any media?
-
10-17-2014, 09:10 AM #3
If you hear a story you want to believe.. I would fact check it yes.
-
-
10-17-2014, 12:59 PM #4
That has never stopped you from spouting your left wing diatribe, eh?
-
10-17-2014, 02:50 PM #5
1. Why Rumsfeld (who was a private businessman at the time BTW) would have helped someone get chemical and biological weapons when it violates so many international laws escapes me, but it doesn't really matter at this point seeing as that is old news that dates all the way back to 2002.
2. Doesn't really matter if the weapons were "old". Chemical weapons don't deteriorate. Their casings/containers may, but the biological weapons themselves remain viable threats to people, so yes, Hussein did have WMDs as claimed by George W. Is there hypocrisy here? Yes, but not just on Bush's part. Every president since Reagan has been involved and provided support for a war with Iraq. They all are to be blamed for the hypocrisy.
So I don't really see what the "Ah-ha!" moment is here for Democrats.
-
-
10-17-2014, 03:13 PM #6
I think the Onion does better journalism than fox news...
-
10-17-2014, 03:30 PM #7
-
-
10-17-2014, 03:52 PM #8
Thought you were smarter than that.
-
10-17-2014, 04:36 PM #9
But, but Jeremy's Left Wing website that he stole his rebuttal from is so much more accurate than your source.
-
10-17-2014, 05:29 PM #10
Wikipedia?
Glad to see you are still alive and silly as ever.
-