Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11




    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    206
    SCF Rewards
    0

    It was performance enhancing drugs, not steroids. They can not say that it was or was not. That was the initial report and they don't know what it was. As stated before, he has tested clean after the initial test which tel sme it was a mistake and not a steroid problem.

    First, take a second to get of Merriman's ball sack, and listen. Merriman took steroids. Let it go, stop trying to defend him like he's your daddy.

  2. #12






    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    45
    Posts
    12,656
    SCF Rewards
    1,877
    Country
    See randallscardsales's Items on eBay

    The guy was in the top 10 in sacks before the suspension,




    of course with alittle help from the "Juice"

  3. #13




    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    206
    SCF Rewards
    0

    Thank you. His numbers are where they are because of the steroids. And, a Mike Linebacker should not judged by how many sacks they have. They could have 0 sacks and still be the most dominant Middle Linebacker in the gamer. It's now always about numbers, it's about smarts. And obviously, Merriman doesn't have too many, or he wouldn't be taking steroids.

  4. #14




    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    44
    Posts
    341
    SCF Rewards
    550

    Sorry, but are you trying to make me feel sorry for you? You have the best team in the AFC and yet you're complaining. People who ***** and moan when there team if having a phenominal season make me sick. You know what I think? That you need to be happy that your team is going to go far in the playoffs, and stop trying to make me feel as if the Chargers got shafted in the Pro Bowl. "Get real".

    Excuse me? I'm not complaining about my team, I am defending of my teams' guys. I am ecstaric that the Chargers are the best team in football. However, I am bitter at the fact that people are saying Shawne Meriman does not deserve a Pro Bowl bid. He was leasding all LB in the voting and lead all at the end of the coaches and player voting. Guys go to the PB for what they do on the field and that was my rant. It had nothing to do with my team. If you would read it more carefully next time, you would have seen that.

  5. #15




    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    44
    Posts
    341
    SCF Rewards
    550

    Thank you. His numbers are where they are because of the steroids. And, a Mike Linebacker should not judged by how many sacks they have. They could have 0 sacks and still be the most dominant Middle Linebacker in the gamer. It's now always about numbers, it's about smarts. And obviously, Merriman doesn't have too many, or he wouldn't be taking steroids.

    you all can continue to talk the talk but here is wehat I propose. If Shawne never tests dirty again, then people will look at this situation different. Whereas if he does test dirty again, I would fully agree with you guys. Until then, don't judge unless you get the whole truth.

  6. #16




    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    206
    SCF Rewards
    0

    Okay, I believ that's fair. I never said that I considered Merriman in any way a bad player, he is the best young Mike Linebacker in the game. But, I still can't forgive him for taking steroids. Consider this, Barry Bonds only tested positive once, and yet everyone wants to throw out his records. Granted, there is a lot more hype around Bonds, but Merriman doesn't seem to be getting any kind of negative reaction for his test. All I'm saying is that it annoys me that a guy can test positive for steroids, and still make it to the Pro Bowl.

  7. #17




    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    44
    Posts
    341
    SCF Rewards
    550

    Okay, I believ that's fair. I never said that I considered Merriman in any way a bad player, he is the best young Mike Linebacker in the game. But, I still can't forgive him for taking steroids. Consider this, Barry Bonds only tested positive once, and yet everyone wants to throw out his records. Granted, there is a lot more hype around Bonds, but Merriman doesn't seem to be getting any kind of negative reaction for his test. All I'm saying is that it annoys me that a guy can test positive for steroids, and still make it to the Pro Bowl.

    In your example using Barry Bonds, he probably went to the All Star game, the equivalent of the PB, after his positive test. The only difference is that Bonds has done the run around on his use in saying that he may have "unknowingly took some sort of steroid". Shawne claims he took an uver the counter supplement which everyone knows is not regulated by the FDA. That means they could add anything to the supplement without stating on the container that the substance is in it.

    However, I stand by the fact that Shawne tested positive nearly 2 months before the regular season started and has not tested positive since. For any football fan, that should not be a coincidence. Additionally, if the players/coaches felt he should not be in the PB, they would have voted another way. As it stands, he was the leading vote getter of all linebackers. That tells me that even his own peers and coaches don't feel he is a user of "the juice".

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Follow SCF on