Results 41 to 50 of 61
-
09-22-2011, 09:24 AM #41
but is there really a reason to make a big deal out of it?
-
-
09-22-2011, 09:25 AM #42
I think what he's saying is that no matter what your majority or minority in this country, an action like this should be viewed the same across the board. If it's not then there is his double standard argument.
Myself I can see both sides of this debate and am unsure which side I'd go with if I had to pick. I guess a lot of the debate is "what if" so I'd rather look at the actual facts of this instance. Although if a white group were to do something similar to this it would be huge news. I can agree with that argument of his, but not really sure where that gets us.
-
09-22-2011, 09:27 AM #43
You clearly did not read the entire article. This is not about Cherokee nation funds that they earned themselves nor is it about savings that they earned.
After Cherokee Supreme Court upheld the 2007 vote on Aug. 22, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development temporarily froze $33 million in funds while it studies the issue. Federal lawmakers who believe the amendment violated the freedmen's civil rights had lobbied federal agencies to cut funding to the tribe.
Along with losing services, Nash and other descendants of freedmen won't be able to vote in the hotly contested Sept. 24 election for principal chief
The Cherokee are excluding them from Federal funds for housing, health care and food as well as the right to vote in the Cherokee chief election. I am fine with the election thing but they have no right to exclude people from Federally funded housing because they are not a particular race.
There is no statement as to the financial source of the health care and food stipends but it is logical that if they are getting HUD for their housing then they are getting federal assistance for health care and food too.
And if you honestly believe that the Cherokee nation is a self-supporting entity that needs and recieves no outside support then you are terribly mistaken.
-
-
09-22-2011, 09:29 AM #44
I guess for me, if these slave descendants are not longer living on reservation and contributing to the reservation then I can see where they would want to cut those costs. Seems like they could slowly phase them out with Grandfather clauses or something rather than just axing people who have had these benefits for years and are no longer able to provide for themselves or retired.
-
09-22-2011, 09:32 AM #45
Yes, you get my point.
It gets us nowhere because there are obviously a lot of people who think that racism only exists inside of white people. If non-whites wrong other non-whites then it is just "embracing their heritage".
-
-
09-22-2011, 09:35 AM #46
If they don't live on the reservation then they have no rights to anything tribal related...but neither do blood-Cherokee living off of the reservation either. Otherwise the double-standard remains.
-
09-22-2011, 10:04 AM #47
so you are telling me that even if the federal govt give money and helps these people then they need to share it with everyone else? That makes absolutely no sense. Native americans make their money living off the land and building casinos to everything they need. Im not sure the federal government gives them much if anything
-
-
09-22-2011, 10:15 AM #48

so, like every other injustice I have ever mentioned, this is ok and there is a reason. There isn't a white college fund because it would never be allowed. It would be deemed racist. And I'm sorry, the idea of it being harder for minorities to get into college went away decades ago. Admission is easier (lower test scores are allowed for minorities, points are added on top of admissions testing if you are a minority, etc) for minorities and money is much easier to get. I graduated high school almost 15 years ago. Of the stack of scholarships readily available to my high school, only 33% could I apply for as a white male. The other 2/3 were for females and various minorities.
I have no issue with BET. There is a difference in entertainment and the allocation of money. My issue with things like miss black america is exactly what this thread is about. There isn't a miss white america because it would never be allowed. there would be outcry from everyone and you know it. If we want to be a country who does away with racism, we need to stop promoting one group over another and defining them only be race. How does miss black america help anything?
-
09-22-2011, 10:20 AM #49
Dude! It says in the article that $33 million in HUD funding was frozen? Since when is $33 million nothing? Did you even read the article?
Just to further add to this. The Federal government gives them all of this:
* Health care, prescriptions, eyeglasses and hospitalization are all covered under Federal Indian Health Services, funded by the Federal government.
* The tribal housing authority helps members buy and remodel homes. They are funded by HUD, a Federal government program.
* By simply being part Cherokee (I think 1/8th is the minimum) you are qualified for a $1000 per semester scholarship from the government.
Also, the Cherokee do not make their money off of casinos. While the Cherokee nation government makes around $350 million a year from casinos that money is not divided up or distributed to the Cherokee people.
-
09-22-2011, 10:26 AM #50
So I guess by this statement you are okay with anyone, white, asian, european, etc applying to recieve this funding? Interesting concept. Find a funding source and apply regardless of whether or not the funding is meant for you. If they turn you down, just call it racism. That makes perfect sense.
-














