View Poll Results: DID YOU PRAY THAT PRAYER AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS FIRST POST TO GOD FOR THE FIRST TIME?
- Voters
- 43. This poll is closed
-
YES
2 4.65% -
NO
16 37.21% -
I ALREADY PRAYED/ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST INTO MY HEART BEFORE
17 39.53% -
OTHER
8 18.60%
Results 101 to 110 of 481
-
03-25-2012, 10:49 PM #101
The bible is God breathed. There is a good reason why those books didn't make it into the bible. They didn't meet the criteria. The weren't written by the eyewitnesses. They weren't writtin in the lifetime of the writer. Many of them contradict the rest of scritpture.
-
-
03-25-2012, 10:54 PM #102
I wonder if God collects cards?
-
03-26-2012, 08:27 AM #103
You realized that the books that did make it to the bible often contradict each other don't you?Drug and smoke free trading.
Hidden Content
Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
Hidden Content darkdemon202404
-
-
03-26-2012, 09:02 AM #104

[QUOTE]The bible is God breathed. There is a good reason why those books didn't make it into the bible. They didn't meet the criteria. The weren't written by the eyewitnesses. They weren't writtin in the lifetime of the writer. Many of them contradict the rest of scritpture.[/QUOTE
maybe you should look at who put the "bible together" had little to do with eyewitness' and some of the ones left out contradict what the "church" deemed as god's rules, ways, and desires. god had very little to nothing to do with the book we call the old and new testamnts
-
03-26-2012, 10:17 AM #105

[QUOTE=shrewsbury;11286405]
The bible is God breathed. There is a good reason why those books didn't make it into the bible. They didn't meet the criteria. The weren't written by the eyewitnesses. They weren't writtin in the lifetime of the writer. Many of them contradict the rest of scritpture.[/QUOTE
maybe you should look at who put the "bible together" had little to do with eyewitness' and some of the ones left out contradict what the "church" deemed as god's rules, ways, and desires. god had very little to nothing to do with the book we call the old and new testamnts
anyone who has actually studied what got in and why, instead of reading the da vinci code or read a blog would understand how incorrect that statement is.
first of all, the old testament never had debates about inclusion. the old testament has been the old testament for over 2000 years.
the books excluded from the new testament were excluded for actual reasons, not controversial ones. the only controversy involved is caused by people who want to accuse the church of something so they throw out vague statements and generalities.
-
-
03-26-2012, 10:25 AM #106
I'd love to see him break a box!Collecting signed Donruss Diamond Kings - 155/243
'82 DKs: 15/27 - '83 DKs: 16/27 - '84 DKs: 15/27
'85 DKs: 18/27 - '86 DKs: 18/27 - '87 DKs: 18/27
'88 DKs: 21/27 - '89 DKs: 19/27 - '90 DKs: 15/27
-
03-26-2012, 10:43 AM #107
Everyone would accuse him of being a pack searcher if he get's any hits.
-
-
03-26-2012, 11:51 AM #108
[quote=ensbergcollector;11286628]
If you want vague, look at your post.
Care to tell us what those reason are?
-
03-26-2012, 12:30 PM #109
[QUOTE=Wickabee;11286946]
You can read all about it here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Develop...estament_canon
-
03-26-2012, 12:53 PM #110
I trust Wikipedia for information about as much as I trust the courts for justice or priests for spirituality.
-













