Results 21 to 30 of 32
-
03-28-2012, 12:34 PM #21
They are already enforcing components of it tho. My health care provider is required to cover my oldest son until he hits 26 or gets a job that offers him the chance to purchase his own. I guess then he will be required to purchase his own or be fined (taxed) for not having it.
I asked the insurance rep why he was covered until he is 26 and was told it is part of the Obamacare plan.
-
-
03-28-2012, 01:18 PM #22
"The minimum coverage provision is necessary to carry those provisions into execution, because without them, without those provisions, without minimum coverage, guaranteed issue and community rating will, as the experience in the States showed, make matters worse, not better. There will be fewer people covered; it will cost more." - Solicitor General Verrilli yesterday
http://mrctv.org/videos/justice-soto...ommerce-clauseLast edited by AUTaxMan; 03-28-2012 at 01:20 PM.
-
03-28-2012, 01:20 PM #23
edit - repost
-
-
03-28-2012, 02:22 PM #24
pretty clever that you rhymed Obama with Osoma.
-
03-28-2012, 10:10 PM #25
The reason Obama wants kids covered on the parents plan till 26 is because under his administration it will be until there 26 before they will find a job..
-
-
03-28-2012, 10:13 PM #26
This is how the Mass law is
However, It is cheaper to give up the tax credit here then buy Heath Insurance....Last edited by MadMan1978; 03-28-2012 at 10:15 PM.
-
03-28-2012, 10:24 PM #27
Just more double talk ....
-
-
03-28-2012, 11:56 PM #28
How is it double talk? Are you just trolling?
-
03-29-2012, 08:49 AM #29
I think he is, or he just doesn't understand what your saying. I even agree with you on this point.
-
04-01-2012, 04:29 PM #30
Because pretty much all you say is something spit out by someone in the GOP. Trolling ? I think not
For over 40 years people in the country have spoke of some form of universal health care and you call it more welfare...
I am sure you don't mind if we have decent health care in this country...you just don't want to pay for ANYTHING for the greater good of society! AND YES this would be in the interest of Society and everyone in this country! Although I will agree that the cost in Dollars is something more then anyone, even myself, expect, we need to have this in this great country. Call me a liberal I could care less if your opinion....I know this has been needed for MANY years and will be need for years to come. I beleive finding the middle on all this is what we need to seek. NOT what the those good Christians call welfare...
Now to the what the court asked and such...
The states in this case MOST likely will win. This is far reaching and should not be a law forcing the citizens to hold some form of heath insurance.
-


















