Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    59
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    Your thoughts on term limits.

    What do you guys see as the pros and cons of having your President (not Obama specifically) limited to 8 years in office? In Canada, we elect a party not a leader, but we have the ability to continually keep selecting that party for as long as we are happy with them.

  2. #2




    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    15,120
    SCF Rewards
    261
    Country
    See bbra9027's Items on eBay

    I kind of have mixed views on it. On one hand I think that change is good and we need to hear a different voice every 4-8 years. However if the man in the seat is doing a good job I think that it is wrong for him not to be elgible to run if that is who the people want in office.
    Drug and smoke free trading.

    Hidden Content
    Hidden Content cardscomicsmoviesandgames
    Hidden Content darkdemon202404

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,979
    SCF Rewards
    1,033
    Country
    See j80rice's Items on eBay

    i a very much in favor of the 2 terms for president. my bigger issue is why there aren't term limits on senators and representatives.

  4. #4




    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    9,435
    SCF Rewards
    376
    Country
    See bodyelectricmethod's Items on eBay

    However if the man in the seat is doing a good job I think that it is wrong for him not to be elgible to run if that is who the people want in office.

    but then we get into "what is a good job"

  5. #5





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    On one hand politicians, like diapers, need to be changed often.
    On the other hand, if you change all the time, can any real long term progress be made?
    On the third hand, I can't stand the Canadian Conservatives and I'd love to see Harper out by (almost) any means necessary.

    Tough call.

  6. #6




    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    59
    Posts
    7,903
    SCF Rewards
    7,333
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (205)
    Country
    See habsheaven's Items on eBay

    My main issue with it is the lack of accountability once a President wins his second term. He/She can do anything they want (that's not impeachable) and they have no fear of having to face the voters over it.

  7. #7





    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    17,461
    Blog Entries
    2
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (66)
    Country

    My main issue with it is the lack of accountability once a President wins his second term. He/She can do anything they want (that's not impeachable) and they have no fear of having to face the voters over it.

    Yes but at the same time he doesn't have to play the same games he did in term 1 because he doesn't have to worry about getting re-elected.
    Double edged sword

  8. #8







    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Age
    56
    Posts
    19,098
    SCF Rewards
    1,943
    Blog Entries
    6
    Country

    I support term limits because it avoids situations where a politician sits in an office for years and years simply because the voters don't bother to look at alternatives. Sen. Robert Byrd is a prime example. In spite of a checkered background he was voted into office over and over by people who didn't vote for anyone else simply because they had voted for Byrd for so many years that it was just habit for them to keep doing it.

  9. #9




    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    51
    Posts
    10,729
    SCF Rewards
    425
    Country
    See Star_Cards's Items on eBay

    I'm fine with the presidential term limit or four years. I think less or more would be bad. I do think that they should limit the length of the primary campaigns. There's no reason to have it so long. I get that they need time to campaign before preliminaries, but I think all of the primaries should be done in about 6 months. I also think that at some point in the primaries if a person holds another political office that they should step down to run for office. I'm not sure if that is exactly fair or practical but they were voted in to do a job and are paid to do that job and not off campaigning for another office.

    I'm also a huge proponent of term limits for all other federal politicians and probably state to that matter. The fact that some people get in to an office and stay there until they die isn't good for the system. I think term limits would be very beneficial.

  10. #10




    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    10,135
    SCF Rewards
    903
    Country

    In Puerto Rico there is no term for a governor to be selected and history has shown that regardless on who it is...every 4-8 years we have a change anyway. At some point regardless of a good job or not, people get tired of the same person. It is up to the voters and the politicians to make the changes and that is what people don;t get.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on