Why Liberals Behave the Way They Do

[Rockman]

Back to the article...Am I the only one that finds this part hilarious?

The "root cause" of the Democrats' wild allegations against Republicans, their fear of change, their slogans and insane metaphors, are all explained by mass psychology, diagnosed more than a century ago by the French psychologist Gustave Le Bon, on whose work much of my own book is based.

Le Bon's 1896 book, "The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind," was carefully read by Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini in order to learn how to incite mobs. Our liberals could have been Le Bon's study subjects.

She admits she has based her work on Le Bon, she then says that he was studied by Hitler and Mussolini, but then goes on to say, oh hey it's the Democrats that do this, essentially comparing them to Hitler and Mussolini, but casually ignoring the part where she says SHE BASIS HER WORK ON HIM. How does anyone find her credible? And this isn't a liberal thing, it's very much people giving credit to someone who doesn't deserve any just because she is in the public eye.

[*censored*]

This is just more reason why I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. And neither should anyone else.

[mrveggieman]

That's as good an explantaion as any for the posts he has made today. Maybe someone peed in his corn flakes this morning?

I just threw up in my mouth after reading that.

[pghin08]

This is just more reason why I don't take Ann Coulter seriously. And neither should anyone else.

Totally agree, there are plenty of legit conservative voices out there. Taking Ann Coulter seriously is as ridiculous as taking Bill Maher seriously.

[Wickabee]

Starts off with an ad written right into the story. Classy!

[pghin08]

Starts off with an ad written right into the story. Classy!

That's Ann Coulter, for you.

[Wickabee]

can't believe there are so many out there who can't figure out she writes entertainment, not fact.

[duwal]

its sad people in my party still value anything this woman has coming out of her mind. She is a big embarrassment to Republicans

[Star_Cards]

I clicked the link and say it was from Ann Colter so I closed the window. I've heard enough of her in the past to know she's just looking to stir things up and she rarely says anything that has much value at all.

[tutall]

Back to the article...Am I the only one that finds this part hilarious?



She admits she has based her work on Le Bon, she then says that he was studied by Hitler and Mussolini, but then goes on to say, oh hey it's the Democrats that do this, essentially comparing them to Hitler and Mussolini, but casually ignoring the part where she says SHE BASIS HER WORK ON HIM. How does anyone find her credible? And this isn't a liberal thing, it's very much people giving credit to someone who doesn't deserve any just because she is in the public eye.

Im sure you can find many other parts of the book to criticize but you swung and missed on this one... She based this book on writings of Le Bon's stances and how Hitler and Mussolini used Le Bon to incite riots.... She doesnt base her teachings or thoughts on Le Bon.....