Obama Wants More Money

[INTIMADATOR2007]

Still makes you a liar claiming he kept none. Shows what the Republican party is about. They have an arguable case, but instead lie about semi related things. Like the last debate. Romney has Obama on the ropes about Benghazi and instead of hitting Obama with it, he got into a semantics argument about whether Obama said the words "act of terror" in the rose garden, which Obama did say. Why lie if you already have a case? Because your case is actually weak, gives no reason to for for Romney, only against Obama, and is dependant on spin and not letting fact checkers anywhere near it, is what I think.

Obama did say "acts of terror " but he wasn't talking about bengazzi , he was talking about it in general. And if he did claim it was an "act of terror" why for 13 days after the rose garden interview he said nothing about "acts of terror " but continued along with the whole administration to say it was abaout the video. How can you keep defending him on this issue when the whole administration has already confessed it was not the video or any protest but a planned terrorist attack several weeks after they got caught with there pants down ? Liberals will go off the deep end for Obama and i just do not understand why ?

[Wickabee]

Obama did say "acts of terror " but he wasn't talking about bengazzi , he was talking about it in general. And if he did claim it was an "act of terror" why for 13 days after the rose garden interview he said nothing about "acts of terror " but continued along with the whole administration to say it was abaout the video. How can you keep defending him on this issue when the whole administration has already confessed it was not the video or any protest but a planned terrorist attack several weeks after they got caught with there pants down ? Liberals will go off the deep end for Obama and i just do not understand why ?

Hey, I agree with you wholeheartedly. I thought Romney was going to hand Obama his head on a platter, but instead got into a argument that, despite the larger point, he was completely wrong in. On the larger point of the debacle it was, I'm with you. But I have to wonder why Romney would to after him on a lie instead of arguing the absolute facts, which are bad enough. Why lie when you don't have to? That's pathological.