Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1




    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,403
    SCF Rewards
    689
    Country
    Denver Broncos
    See Just a buyer, no page.'s Items on eBay

    Question about 1999 Topps Gold Label

    My question is about the series numbering on the back of the 1999 Topps Gold Label cards. The "Red Label" versions.

    Here, check this one out;

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/1999-Topps-...kAAOSwW0tcsR8V

    They guy is calling it an error due to the lack of foil on the serial number.

    My question is, is that true?

    I have two red label cards from that set. A Troy Aikman /100 and a Rod Smith /25. Both have the same condition. Neither one has foil in the serial number. They are embossed, rather than printed.

    I remember puling the Aikman while on a trip to California from a Target, and wondering about it then, and asking my LCS dealer about when I bought the R. Smith. At the time, we thought that was just a new thing Topps was doing to be different. Just embossing the numbers without using foil.

    Anyway, anyone out there with numbered 1999 Topps Gold? Are yours stamped without foil also? Or are these truly some kind of error, with most of the numbered cards from that set having printed, as well as embossed numbers?

    These are my only cards with this kind of numbering, and I am just wondering if this is an error, like the 2000 Playoff Contenders Championship versions that aren't numbered (clear error cards), or is this the way these cards are supposed to be?

    I think that the embossing is correct, and this isn't any error. But I don't KNOW that as fact. Any help is appreciated.

  2. #2




    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    447
    SCF Rewards
    1,479
    Transferred Feedback
    Beckett (98)
    Country
    See TGLGUY's Items on eBay

    I can CONFIRM that these are NOT error cards. For whatever reason, Topps did not put any coloring/ink in the sequence #s of the 1999 football set and the 1998-99 hockey set (not sure what happened with baseball & basketball). I have completed the class 1 RED 1998-99 hockey set and I am 6 cards away from the 1999 class 1 red set, NONE of the cards have any coloring in the sequene #s.

    Hope this helps

    Dan

  3. #3




    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,403
    SCF Rewards
    689
    Country
    Denver Broncos
    See Just a buyer, no page.'s Items on eBay

    I can CONFIRM that these are NOT error cards. For whatever reason, Topps did not put any coloring/ink in the sequence #s of the 1999 football set and the 1998-99 hockey set (not sure what happened with baseball & basketball). I have completed the class 1 RED 1998-99 hockey set and I am 6 cards away from the 1999 class 1 red set, NONE of the cards have any coloring in the sequene #s.

    Hope this helps

    Dan


    That pretty much confirms my thoughts on this. That these are not errors.

    Probably just trying something different, or maybe just saving money on the foil that we normally see.

    Not the first time Topps has used a different style for their numbering. I have a Bowman 2000 Mike Anderson that has a little tiny black numbering on the bottom that's actually pretty hard to see.

    Thanks Dan!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
SCF Sponsors


About SCF

    Sports Card Forum provides sports and non-sports card collectors a safe place to discuss, buy, sell and trade.

    SCF maintains tools that will allow collectors to manage their collections online, information about what is happening with the hobby, as well as providing robust data to send out for Autographs through the mail.

Sponsors



Follow SCF on