Results 1 to 10 of 20
-
03-01-2008, 07:02 PM #1
Something I Noticed
Does anyone else notice the Bears don't have any better WRs now? They lost "Moose" and Bernard, they better pick someonw else or Hester is their #1....
-
-
03-01-2008, 07:05 PM #2
WRONG!!! lol
MY MAN MARK BRADLEY!!!
Youll see my 2 player collections on either side... dynamic duo!!
Hahaha, but seriously... They've been expecting Bradley to be great hes just been injured his whole two year career, but when hes in there he makes electrifying plays... Hes also pretty big as well as VERY fast
-
03-01-2008, 07:07 PM #3
He may work but who's the #2 and #3 guys then? Bradley still is unproven though..
-
-
03-01-2008, 07:09 PM #4
Not when hes healthy... Hes def proven himself! We also have Hester who I think will be amazing at WR (obviously). I also think we might split Greg Olsen most of the time when we need 3 wide and have dallas clark in at TE. Or Rashied Davis...
-
03-01-2008, 07:20 PM #5
man, you must have low expectations in chicago if you think mark bradley has "proven himself"
in 3 years (32 games played i believe), he has 38 receptions and less than 600 yards.....injured or not, thats not a proven receiver.....and part of proving your ability to contribute is staying healthy.
-
-
03-01-2008, 07:28 PM #6
Do you know how much he has been on the field? OBVIOUSLY not, because if you did you would know that its not that much... He may have played in 32 games but he might have been on the field for 10 plays in a game 3 of them being passing plays. And 4 TD's... All Im going to say is dont say anything if you havent seen him play, which Im sure you havent...
-
03-01-2008, 07:35 PM #7
lol, i watch tons of football buddy!! i know i watch more than you, unless you watch 7-9 pro games every weekend. so dont question whether i watch football or not.
the numbers dont lie, and again, part of "proving yourself" is staying healthy - his health is a poor arguement for him being a proven commodity
-
-
03-01-2008, 07:50 PM #8
proudest is right he has not proven himself, let him has a healthy 16 game season and 1,000ish yds and 5-7 tds, then we'll talk lol
-
03-01-2008, 07:59 PM #9
Proudest, can you read??? I dont think so because not one place did I question your football knowledge or how much you watch it... I clearly said have you seen HIM play... and you guys can think what you want, but I doubt youve seen him play, which means you dont know where im coming from... thats all im out
-
03-01-2008, 08:17 PM #10
wow.....yes, i can read.....is that your best arguement on this issue, my literacy??
All Im going to say is dont say anything if you havent seen him play, which Im sure you havent
id say that is questioning how much ive watched the guy play....ive seen the guy play enough to judge, i watch a ton of football....you think you are some how the ONLY person that has seen him play?? thats all you keep saying, back it up with stats if he's so great.....that wont happen though, cause he has none!! the most telling stat of all is the one you keep using as a defense (he's been injured)
-
Originally Posted by cubsfantid 
