Palin and Financial Management

[Yanksfan396]

It's as simple as this:

So far, 100% of the pro-Palin members refuse to address the "claim" (we'll call it that, now) because they don't prefer the source. Which logical fallacy is this, my friends??

[walt55054life]

Edited:not correct fallacy

[Yanksfan396]

Edited:not correct fallacy

With those who are dodging, we're looking at a prime example of Ad Hominem.

[RedGoneWILD]

lmao...this forum is great!

[walt55054life]

I belive so....or on my end of it it is definately the burden of proof!!!!

[walt55054life]

and as far as mike his fallacy is strictly circumstantial ad hominem not prime example of ad hominem

[walt55054life]

but enough about fallacies i believe this thread is trashed because your article is WEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Yanksfan396]

but enough about fallacies i believe this thread is trashed because your article is WEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First off, I didn't write that article. Secondly, if the "claim" at hand is so outlandish, then why not address it? Besides discrediting every source posted, why not tell my why this could not have possibly happened?

[RedGoneWILD]

you gotta give her credit....she put the luxury plane on eBay

[Rockman]

but enough about fallacies i believe this thread is trashed because your article is WEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think you need a couple more exclamation marks, and maybe a few more words capitalized so we can get the full amount of emphasis you are going for.

Just for the record I personally love the logical fallacy game.....And your quote is a fallacy but thats here nor there.